Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Monday, October 11, 2010 - 2:00 pm

(cc linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org)

On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:30:22 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:


It's corruption of user memory, which is unusual.  I'd be wondering if
there was a pre-existing bug which 6dda9d55bf545013597 has exposed -
previously the corruption was hitting something harmless.  Something
like a missed CPU cache writeback or invalidate operation.

How sensitive/vulnerable is PPC32 to such things?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 11, 5:52 am)
Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55, Andrew Morton, (Mon Oct 11, 2:00 pm)
Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Oct 18, 1:59 pm)