On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:59:55 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <email@example.com> wrote:
Hmm, them, existing problem but this add a new pitfall.
What's your recomendation to make progess on this work ?
I think 1st step will be..
- explain the problem of priority inversion in cgroup+cfs documenation with
I'm sorry I'm not sure there have been trials for fixing priority inversion
in the linux scheduler development.
Explaining my motivation, a user of this feature on my customer is virtual machine
rental service. So, some fuctionality as
"When vcpu holds spinlock in kernel, please don't sleep.." will be nice.
Is there patch already ?