> Em 15-10-2010 09:23, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > On Friday, October 15, 2010 14:05:39 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em 15-10-2010 07:02, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> >>> On Friday, October 15, 2010 11:05:26 Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:45:45 +0200 Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Thursday, October 14, 2010 22:06:29
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:13:25 PDT,
akpm@linux-foundation.org said:
> >>>>>>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2010-10-13-17-13 has been uploaded to
> >>>
> >>> Mauro, is this something for you to fix?
> >>
> >> I have a patch fixing this conflict already:
> >>
> >>
http://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/sbtvd.git?a=commit;h=88164fbe701a0a16e9044b74443dddb618...
> >>
> >> The patch is currently on a separate tree, that I'm using to test some experimental
> >> drivers for Brazilian Digital TV system (SBTVD). I'm planning to merge this patch, among
> >> with other patches I received for .37 during this weekend.
> >
> > No, this patch isn't sufficient. It backs out the wrong code but doesn't put
> > in the 'video_is_registered()' if statements that were in my original patch.
> >
> > Those are really needed.
>
> Ok, I've re-done the conflict fix patch:
>
>
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=f9fccb...