Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Cox
Date: Monday, November 15, 2010 - 3:57 am

> The goal was to make the oom killer heuristic as predictable as possible 

Meta question - why is that a good thing. In a desktop environment it's
frequently wrong, in a server environment it is often wrong. We had this
before where people spend months fiddling with the vm and make it work
slightly differently and it suits their workload, then other workloads go
downhill. Then the cycle repeats.


Which changeset added it to the Documentation directory as deprecated ?

Alan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Wed Nov 3, 4:47 pm)
Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Wed Nov 3, 6:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Nov 9, 4:01 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Tue Nov 9, 2:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Tue Nov 9, 2:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Wed Nov 10, 1:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, Figo.zhang, (Sun Nov 14, 8:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, David Rientjes, (Mon Nov 15, 3:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, Alan Cox, (Mon Nov 15, 3:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, David Rientjes, (Mon Nov 15, 1:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Nov 23, 12:16 am)