Re: [PATCH 0/8] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy reclaim during high-order allocations

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ted Ts'o
Date: Friday, November 19, 2010 - 8:45 am

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 02:05:32PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:

I'd suggest doing it now (or soon, before 2.6.40), just to make sure
there aren't massive complaints about performance regressions, etc.,
and then deprecating it at say 2.6.42, and then waiting 6-9 months
before removing it.  But, I'm a bit more conservative about making
such changes.

(Said the person who has reluctantly agreed to keep the minixdf mount
option after we found users when we tried deprecating it.  :-)

       	     	      	    	    	  - Ted
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy rec ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Nov 18, 1:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: compaction: Use the LRU to get a hint ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Nov 18, 2:10 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/8] mm: vmscan: Reclaim order-0 and use compac ..., Andrea Arcangeli, (Thu Nov 18, 11:09 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm: migration: Allow migration to operate ..., Andrea Arcangeli, (Thu Nov 18, 11:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 6/8] mm: compaction: Perform a faster scan in t ..., Andrea Arcangeli, (Thu Nov 18, 11:34 am)
Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: compaction: Use the LRU to get a hint ..., Andrea Arcangeli, (Thu Nov 18, 11:46 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm: migration: Allow migration to operate ..., Andrea Arcangeli, (Thu Nov 18, 12:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/8] mm: compaction: Perform a faster scan in t ..., Andrea Arcangeli, (Thu Nov 18, 12:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy rec ..., Ted Ts'o, (Fri Nov 19, 8:45 am)