login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
November
»
2
Re: [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should get bonus
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Figo.zhang
Subject:
Re: [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should get bonus
Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 - 7:24 am
>
quoted text
> Which applications are you referring to that cannot gracefully exit if > killed?
like Xorg server, if xorg server be killed, the gnome desktop will be crashed.
quoted text
> > CAP_SYS_RAWIO had a much more dramatic impact in the previous heuristic to > such a point that it would often allow memory hogging tasks to elude the > oom killer at the expense of innocent tasks. I'm not sure this is the > best way to go.
is it some experiments for demonstration the CAP_SYS_RAWIO will elude the oom killer? --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should g ...
, Figo.zhang
, (Mon Nov 1, 6:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes shou ...
, David Rientjes
, (Mon Nov 1, 8:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes shou ...
, Figo.zhang
, (Tue Nov 2, 7:24 am)
Re: [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes shou ...
, David Rientjes
, (Tue Nov 2, 12:34 pm)
[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, Figo.zhang
, (Wed Nov 3, 4:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, David Rientjes
, (Wed Nov 3, 4:47 pm)
Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, Figo.zhang
, (Wed Nov 3, 6:38 pm)
Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, David Rientjes
, (Wed Nov 3, 6:50 pm)
Re: Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, Figo.zhang
, (Wed Nov 3, 7:12 pm)
Re: Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, David Rientjes
, (Wed Nov 3, 7:54 pm)
Re: Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, Figo.zhang
, (Wed Nov 3, 9:42 pm)
Re: Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, David Rientjes
, (Wed Nov 3, 10:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes shou ...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Tue Nov 9, 3:41 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Tue Nov 9, 4:01 am)
[PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processes sh ...
, Figo.zhang
, (Tue Nov 9, 5:24 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Nov 9, 5:24 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, David Rientjes
, (Tue Nov 9, 2:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, David Rientjes
, (Tue Nov 9, 2:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, David Rientjes
, (Tue Nov 9, 2:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, Figo.zhang
, (Wed Nov 10, 7:38 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, Figo.zhang
, (Wed Nov 10, 7:48 am)
[PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processes sh ...
, Figo.zhang
, (Wed Nov 10, 8:14 am)
[PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processes sh ...
, Figo.zhang
, (Wed Nov 10, 8:24 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
, David Rientjes
, (Wed Nov 10, 1:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, David Rientjes
, (Wed Nov 10, 2:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Sat Nov 13, 10:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Sat Nov 13, 10:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, David Rientjes
, (Sun Nov 14, 2:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, David Rientjes
, (Sun Nov 14, 2:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Sun Nov 14, 6:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series
, Figo.zhang
, (Sun Nov 14, 8:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, David Rientjes
, (Mon Nov 15, 3:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series
, David Rientjes
, (Mon Nov 15, 3:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series
, Alan Cox
, (Mon Nov 15, 3:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series
, David Rientjes
, (Mon Nov 15, 1:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Tue Nov 23, 12:16 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Tue Nov 23, 12:16 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, David Rientjes
, (Sat Nov 27, 6:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Tue Nov 30, 6:00 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, David Rientjes
, (Tue Nov 30, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, Figo.zhang
, (Tue Jan 4, 12:51 am)
Re: [PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
, (Tue Jan 4, 1:28 am)
Re: [PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processe ...
, Figo.zhang
, (Tue Jan 4, 1:56 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 041/196] kobject: add kobject_init_and_add function
Lukas Hejtmanek
Re: Another libata error related to OCZ SSD
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 023/196] MCP_UCB1200: Convert from class_device to device
Florian Fainelli
Re: System clock runs too fast after 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28.1 upgrade
Christoph Lameter
[patch 1/4] mmu_notifier: Core code
git
:
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add strbuf_initf()
John Bito
[EGIT] Push to GitHub caused corruption
Jakub Narebski
Re: [PATCH 0/2] gitweb: patch view
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH] When a remote is added but not fetched, tell the user.
Andy Parkins
Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ahci: Workaround HW bug for SB600/700 SATA controller PMP support
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (11086): au0828: rename macro for currently non-function VBI support
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ceph: client types
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ceph: on-wire types
Linux Kernel Mailing List
crypto: chainiv - Use kcrypto_wq instead of keventd_wq
linux-netdev
:
Andrew Morton
Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14969] New: b44: WOL does not work in suspended state
Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Re: [PATCH 03/13] stmmac: add the new Header file for stmmac platform data
Taku Izumi
[PATCH 3/3] ixgbe: add registers etc. printout code just before resetting adapters
Eric Dumazet
rps: some comments
Thomas Gleixner
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:
openbsd-misc
:
Stephan Andreas
problems with login after xlock in OpenBSD release 4.7
pmc
Make A Change. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction Treatment
ropers
Re: what exactly is enc0?
Fuad NAHDI
Re: What does your environment look like?
Matthew Szudzik
Typo on OpenBSD 4.4 CD Set
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate