Re: [thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support for this_cpu_add,sub,dec,inc_return

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Monday, November 29, 2010 - 1:09 pm

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:


Right. I will drop that strange fragment.


The return needs to be constrained to pfo_ret__. If the value wraps around
then we do not want a value larger than the variable returned.

	pfo_ret__ += val;
	pfo_ret;

will do I think.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[thisops uV2 00/10] Upgrade of this_cpu_ops V2, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Nov 26, 2:09 pm)
[thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support for this_cpu_add,sub,dec, ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Nov 26, 2:09 pm)
[thisops uV2 05/10] x86: Use this_cpu_inc_return for nmi c ..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Nov 26, 2:09 pm)
Re: [thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support for this_cpu_add,sub, ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sat Nov 27, 8:00 am)
Re: [thisops uV2 05/10] x86: Use this_cpu_inc_return for n ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sat Nov 27, 8:00 am)
Re: [thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support for this_cpu_add,sub, ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 29, 9:03 am)
Re: [thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support for this_cpu_add,sub, ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 29, 9:31 am)
Re: [thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support for this_cpu_add,sub, ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Nov 29, 11:33 am)
Re: [thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support for this_cpu_add,sub, ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 29, 11:54 am)
Re: [thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support for this_cpu_add,sub, ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Nov 29, 12:22 pm)
Re: [thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support for this_cpu_add,sub, ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 29, 1:09 pm)