[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Figo.zhang
Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 - 4:43 pm

CAP_SYS_RESOURCE also had better get 3% bonus for protection.

Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com>
--- 
mm/oom_kill.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 4029583..30b24b9 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 	 * Root processes get 3% bonus, just like the __vm_enough_memory()
 	 * implementation used by LSMs.
 	 */
-	if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+	if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ||
+	    has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
 		points -= 30;
 
 	/*


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, Figo.zhang, (Wed Nov 3, 4:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Wed Nov 3, 4:47 pm)
Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Wed Nov 3, 6:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Nov 9, 4:01 am)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Tue Nov 9, 2:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Tue Nov 9, 2:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus, David Rientjes, (Wed Nov 10, 1:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, Figo.zhang, (Sun Nov 14, 8:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, David Rientjes, (Mon Nov 15, 3:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, Alan Cox, (Mon Nov 15, 3:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, David Rientjes, (Mon Nov 15, 1:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Nov 23, 12:16 am)