On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 09:53:43PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
Nice. But the issue you're not mentioning is: What errors could have
happened on the 6th of november? Should Con worry about those errors?
OK, the chances are that he has rebooted since november, and that an
older fsck fixed the errors, but not cleared the "fs errror log". Would
these errors have triggered a "remount-readonly" if the fs was mounted
like that?
I don't reboot that often:
obelix:~> uptime
09:16:19 up 175 days, 19:04, 19 users, load average: 110.10, 110.61, 111.22
(and yes, the load is quite high on that machine. I won't polute this
thread about that....)
Roger.
--
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
--