Re: dm9000 patch

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Joe Perches
Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - 2:16 pm

On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 21:57 +0100, Angelo Dureghello wrote:

Does it still occur if you remove the debug line below?
---
 drivers/net/dm9000.c |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dm9000.c b/drivers/net/dm9000.c
index 2d4c4fc..c774430 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dm9000.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dm9000.c
@@ -1077,8 +1077,6 @@ static irqreturn_t dm9000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u8 reg_save;
 
-	dm9000_dbg(db, 3, "entering %s\n", __func__);
-
 	/* A real interrupt coming */
 
 	/* holders of db->lock must always block IRQs */


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: dm9000 patch, Baruch Siach, (Tue Dec 28, 11:06 pm)
Re: dm9000 patch, Angelo Dureghello, (Wed Dec 29, 1:48 am)
Re: dm9000 patch, Angelo Dureghello, (Wed Dec 29, 6:13 am)
Re: dm9000 patch, Baruch Siach, (Wed Dec 29, 11:06 am)
Re: dm9000 patch, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Wed Dec 29, 11:45 am)
Re: dm9000 patch, Angelo Dureghello, (Wed Dec 29, 1:57 pm)
Re: dm9000 patch, Joe Perches, (Wed Dec 29, 2:16 pm)
Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: dm9000 patch, Greg Ungerer, (Wed Dec 29, 5:37 pm)
Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: dm9000 patch, Angelo Dureghello, (Thu Dec 30, 2:59 am)
Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: dm9000 patch, Greg Ungerer, (Thu Dec 30, 4:17 am)
Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: dm9000 patch, Angelo Dureghello, (Thu Dec 30, 8:05 am)
Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: dm9000 patch, Baruch Siach, (Thu Dec 30, 8:12 am)