Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jon Nelson
Date: Thursday, December 9, 2010 - 1:38 pm

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:

Hmm.
The cipher is listed as:
aes-cbc-essiv:sha256


512MB.

'free' reports 75MB, 419MB free.

I originally noticed the problem on really real hardware (thinkpad
T61p), however.

-- 
Jon
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Milan Broz, (Sun Nov 14, 2:54 pm)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Matt, (Sun Nov 14, 4:24 pm)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Heinz Diehl, (Mon Nov 15, 12:25 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Milan Broz, (Mon Nov 15, 1:41 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Matt, (Wed Dec 1, 9:05 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Mike Snitzer, (Wed Dec 1, 9:52 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Matt, (Wed Dec 1, 10:35 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Milan Broz, (Wed Dec 1, 11:24 am)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Jon Nelson, (Wed Dec 1, 12:34 pm)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Heinz Diehl, (Wed Dec 1, 12:59 pm)
Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective, Milan Broz, (Wed Dec 1, 1:45 pm)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Milan Broz, (Sun Dec 5, 3:21 am)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Heinz Diehl, (Sun Dec 5, 5:49 am)
Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Daniel J Blueman, (Sun Dec 5, 1:17 pm)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Mike Snitzer, (Sun Dec 5, 2:15 pm)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption?, Milan Broz, (Wed Dec 8, 1:03 am)
Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm ..., Jon Nelson, (Thu Dec 9, 1:38 pm)