Re: KVM usability

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Sunday, March 7, 2010 - 2:56 am

Hi Avi,

(slightly off-topic)

On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

People keep bringing this up but I don't quite agree. Mac OS X has
"shark" which is pretty much what you describe above. However, having
used both, I prefer perf's simple UI for two reasons: it's much easier
to automate perf commands and text-based reports are superior for
sharing results (and keeping track of results when doing performance
optimizations).

That said, AFAICT, it should be pretty simple to implement a
shark-like UI with GTK as current perf code is pretty good fit for
that. I've pondered about doing that myself but quite frankly, I don't
see any big gains in that.

                        Pekka
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: KVM usability, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 2, 3:30 am)
Re: KVM usability, Avi Kivity, (Sun Mar 7, 2:35 am)
Re: KVM usability, Pekka Enberg, (Sun Mar 7, 2:56 am)
Re: KVM usability, Avi Kivity, (Sun Mar 7, 3:11 am)
Re: KVM usability, Luca Barbieri, (Sun Mar 7, 8:14 am)
Re: KVM usability, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Sun Mar 7, 11:01 am)
Re: KVM usability, Avi Kivity, (Sun Mar 7, 11:15 am)
Re: KVM usability, Avi Kivity, (Sun Mar 7, 11:16 am)
Re: KVM usability, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Mar 7, 11:42 am)
Re: KVM usability, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Sun Mar 7, 11:53 am)
Re: KVM usability, Avi Kivity, (Sun Mar 7, 12:05 pm)