On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:26 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
quoted text > On 03/31/2010 03:26 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Not by adding overhead to every single down_read()/down_write() just to
> > fix a once-off startup problem - that's taking laziness way too far.
> >
>
> How much overhead is this on non-x86 architectures (keep in mind x86
> doesn't use this?)
None on powerpc, we use atomic ops and don't disable IRQs.
BTW. The same problem used to happen with mutex debug. Was this ever
fixed ?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , (Wed Mar 31, 11:50 pm)