Re: [PATCH 5/6] futex: handle timeout inside adaptive lock spin

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Darren Hart
Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 - 10:31 am

Thomas Gleixner wrote:

I haven't come across a better alternative since arming the timer before 
setting TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE isn't appropriate.


Ah, for some reason I was thinking that was only the case if 
CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR was set. Very nice, thanks.

-- 
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 2/6] futex: add futex_q static initializer, Darren Hart, (Mon Apr 5, 1:23 pm)
[PATCH 3/6] futex: refactor futex_lock_pi_atomic, Darren Hart, (Mon Apr 5, 1:23 pm)
[No subject], Ulrich Drepper, (Tue Apr 6, 7:47 am)
[No subject], Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Apr 6, 7:51 am)
[No subject], Darren Hart, (Tue Apr 6, 8:28 am)
[No subject], Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Apr 6, 8:29 am)
[No subject], Darren Hart, (Tue Apr 6, 8:33 am)
[No subject], Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Apr 6, 8:37 am)
[No subject], Avi Kivity, (Tue Apr 6, 9:06 am)
[No subject], Avi Kivity, (Tue Apr 6, 9:10 am)
[No subject], Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Apr 6, 9:14 am)
[No subject], Avi Kivity, (Tue Apr 6, 9:20 am)
[No subject], Alan Cox, (Tue Apr 6, 9:44 am)
[No subject], Alan Cox, (Tue Apr 6, 9:53 am)
[No subject], Alan Cox, (Tue Apr 6, 9:54 am)
[No subject], Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Apr 6, 9:55 am)
[No subject], Ulrich Drepper, (Tue Apr 6, 10:34 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/6] futex: handle timeout inside adaptive lock ..., Darren Hart, (Wed Apr 7, 10:31 am)