> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 10:40 AM
> To: Dmitry Torokhov
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; pv-drivers@vmware.com; Pankaj Thakkar;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] RFC: Network Plugin Architecture (NPA) for
> vmxnet3
>
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:35:28AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Yes, with the exception that the only body of code that will be
> > accepted by the shell should be GPL-licensed and thus open and
> available
> > for examining. This is not different from having a standard kernel
> > module that is loaded normally and plugs into a certain subsystem.
> > The difference is that the binary resides not on guest filesystem
> > but elsewhere.
>
> Forget about the licensing. Loading binary blobs written to a shim
> layer is a complete pain in the ass and totally unsupportable, and
> also uninteresting because of the overhead.