On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 14:13 +0200, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 07:25:14PM +0200, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:36:48PM +0200, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> >> >
> >> > [..]
> >> >> >> Anyway, if that's the case, then we probably need to allow IO from
> >> >> >> multiple sequential readers and keep a watch on throughput. If throughput
> >> >> >> drops then reduce the number of parallel sequential readers. Not sure how
> >> >> >> much of code that is but with multiple cfqq going in parallel, ioprio
> >> >> >> logic will more or less stop working in CFQ (on multi-spindle hardware).
> >> >> Hi Vivek,
> >> >> I tried to implement exactly what you are proposing, see the attached patches.
> >> >> I leverage the queue merging features to let multiple cfqqs share the
> >> >> disk in the same timeslice.
> >> >> I changed the queue split code to trigger on throughput drop instead
> >> >> of on seeky pattern, so diverging queues can remain merged if they
> >> >> have good throughput. Moreover, I measure the max bandwidth reached by
> >> >> single queues and merged queues (you can see the values in the
> >> >> bandwidth sysfs file).
> >> >> If merged queues can outperform non-merged ones, the queue merging
> >> >> code will try to opportunistically merge together queues that cannot
> >> >> submit enough requests to fill half of the NCQ slots. I'd like to know
> >> >> if you can see any improvements out of this on your hardware. There
> >> >> are some magic numbers in the code, you may want to try tuning them.
> >> >> Note that, since the opportunistic queue merging will start happening
> >> >> only after merged queues have shown to reach higher bandwidth than
> >> >> non-merged queues, you should use the disk for a while before trying
> >> >> the test (and you can check sysfs), or the merging will not happen.
> >> >
> >> > Hi Corrado,
> >> >
> >> > I ran these patches and I did not see any improvement. I think the reason
> >> > being that no cooperative queue merging took place and we did not have
> >> > any data for throughput with coop flag on.
> >> >
> >> > #cat /sys/block/dm-3/queue/iosched/bandwidth
> >> > 230     753     0
> >> >
> >> > I think we need to implement something similiar to hw_tag detection logic
> >> > where we allow dispatches from multiple sync-idle queues at a time and try
> >> > to observe the BW. After certain window once we have observed the window,
> >> > then set the system behavior accordingly.
> >> Hi Vivek,
> >> thanks for testing. Can you try changing the condition to enable the
> >> queue merging to also consider the case in which max_bw[1] == 0 &&
> >> max_bw[0] > 100MB/s (notice that max_bw is measured in
> >> sectors/jiffie).
> >> This should rule out low end disks, and enable merging where it can be
> >> beneficial.
> >> If the results are good, but we find this enabling condition
> >> unreliable, then we can think of a better way, but I'm curious to see
> >> if the results are promising before thinking to the details.
> >
> > Ok, I made some changes and now some queue merging seems to be happening
> > and I am getting little better BW. This will require more debugging. I
> > will try to spare some time later.
> >
> > Kernel=2.6.34-rc5-corrado-multicfq
> > DIR= /mnt/iostmnt/fio          DEV= /dev/mapper/mpathe
> > Workload=bsr       iosched=cfq      Filesz=1G    bs=16K
> > ==========================================================================
> > job       Set NR  ReadBW(KB/s)   MaxClat(us)    WriteBW(KB/s)  MaxClat(us)
> > ---       --- --  ------------   -----------    -------------  -----------
> > bsr       1   1   136457         67353          0              0
> > bsr       1   2   148008         192415         0              0
> > bsr       1   4   180223         535205         0              0
> > bsr       1   8   166983         542326         0              0
> > bsr       1   16  176617         832188         0              0
> >
> > Output of iosched/bandwidth
> >
> > 0       546     740
> >
> > I did following changes on top of your patch.
> This is becoming interesting. I think a major limitation of the
> current approach is that it is too easy for a merged queue to be
> separated again.
> My code:
>    if (cfq_cfqq_coop(cfqq) && bw <= cfqd->max_bw[1] * 9/10)
>                 cfq_mark_cfqq_split_coop(cfqq);
> will immediately split any merged queue as soon as max_bw[1] grows too
> much, so it should be based on max_bw[0].
> Moreover, this code will likely split off all cics from the merged
> queue, while it would be much better to split off only the cics that
> are receiving less than their fair share of the BW (this will also
> improve the fairness of the scheduler when queues are merged).

Is there any update on the status of this issue?

Thanks,
Miklos


quoted text
> Corrado
> >
> > Vivek
> >
> > ---
> >  block/cfq-iosched.c |   11 +++++++++--
> >  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > index 4e9e015..7589c44 100644
> > --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ struct cfq_data {
> >         */
> >        int hw_tag_est_depth;
> >        unsigned int hw_tag_samples;
> > +       unsigned int cfqq_merged_samples;
> >        /*
> >         * performance measurements
> >         * max_bw is indexed by coop flag.
> > @@ -1736,10 +1737,14 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfqq_close(struct cfq_data *cfqd,
> >        // Opportunistic queue merging could be beneficial even on far queues
> >        // We enable it only on NCQ disks, if we observed that merged queues
> >        // can reach higher bandwidth than single queues.
> > +       // 204 sectors per jiffy is equivalent to 100MB/s on 1000 HZ conf.
> > +       // Allow merge if we don't have sufficient merged cfqq samples.
> >        rs = cur_cfqq->allocated[READ] + cur_cfqq->allocated[WRITE];
> > -       if (cfqd->hw_tag && cfqd->max_bw[1] > cfqd->max_bw[0] &&
> > +       if (cfqd->hw_tag
> > +          && (cfqd->max_bw[1] > cfqd->max_bw[0]
> > +              || (cfqd->max_bw[0] > 204 && !sample_valid(cfqd->cfqq_merged_samples)))
> >            // Do not overload the device queue
> > -           rs < cfqd->hw_tag_est_depth / 2) {
> > +           && rs < cfqd->hw_tag_est_depth / 2) {
> >                unsigned r1 = __cfqq->allocated[READ] + __cfqq->allocated[WRITE];
> >                unsigned r2 = __cfqq1->allocated[READ] + __cfqq1->allocated[WRITE];
> >                // Prefer merging with a queue that has fewer pending requests
> > @@ -1750,6 +1755,8 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfqq_close(struct cfq_data *cfqd,
> >                // Do not merge if the merged queue would have too many requests
> >                if (r1 + rs > cfqd->hw_tag_est_depth / 2)
> >                        return NULL;
> > +               cfqd->cfqq_merged_samples++;
> > +
> >                // Merge only if the BW of the two queues is comparable
> >                if (abs(__cfqq->last_bw - cur_cfqq->last_bw) * 4 < cfqd->max_bw[0])
> >                        return __cfqq;
> > --
> > 1.6.2.5
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Corrado
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Kernel=2.6.34-rc5-corrado-multicfq
> >> > DIR= /mnt/iostmnt/fio          DEV= /dev/mapper/mpathe
> >> > Workload=bsr       iosched=cfq      Filesz=2G    bs=4K
> >> > ==========================================================================
> >> > job       Set NR  ReadBW(KB/s)   MaxClat(us)    WriteBW(KB/s)  MaxClat(us)
> >> > ---       --- --  ------------   -----------    -------------  -----------
> >> > bsr       1   1   126590         61448          0              0
> >> > bsr       1   2   127849         242843         0              0
> >> > bsr       1   4   131886         508021         0              0
> >> > bsr       1   8   131890         398241         0              0
> >> > bsr       1   16  129167         454244         0              0
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Vivek
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> __________________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >> dott. Corrado Zoccolo                          mailto:czoccolo@gmail.com
> >> PhD - Department of Computer Science - University of Pisa, Italy
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> The self-confidence of a warrior is not the self-confidence of the average
> >> man. The average man seeks certainty in the eyes of the onlooker and calls
> >> that self-confidence. The warrior seeks impeccability in his own eyes and
> >> calls that humbleness.
> >>                                Tales of Power - C. Castaneda
> >
> 
> 
> 


--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/