On 06/14/2010 07:17 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
quoted text
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Now, max_scan of shrink_inactive_list() is always passed less than
> SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. then, we can remove scanning pages loop in it.
> This patch also help stack diet.
>
> detail
>   - remove "while (nr_scanned<  max_scan)" loop
>   - remove nr_freed (now, we use nr_reclaimed directly)
>   - remove nr_scan (now, we use nr_scanned directly)
>   - rename max_scan to nr_to_scan
>   - pass nr_to_scan into isolate_pages() directly instead
>     using SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner<hannes@cmpxchg.org>

Other than the weird whitespace below,

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

quoted text
> +	/*
> +	 * If we are direct reclaiming for contiguous pages and we do
> +	 * not reclaim everything in the list, try again and wait
> +	 * for IO to complete. This will stall high-order allocations
> +	 * but that should be acceptable to the caller
> +	 */
> +	if (nr_reclaimed<  nr_taken&&  !current_is_kswapd()&&  sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode) {
> +		congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);

-- 
All rights reversed
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/