On 06/14/2010 07:41 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
quoted text
> On 06/14/2010 09:08 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 06/09/2010 09:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2010 01:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Peter, are you happy with this?
>>>> Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix a
>>>> regression in post-2.6.34.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I'll push it.
>>>
>>> 	-hpa
>>
>> Peter hi.
>>
>> Why have we missed that patch from -rc3. This is so *not fun* to keep
>> out-of-tree patches. Specially when working with lots of other people's
>> trees.
>>
>> Please push it ASAP
>> Boaz
> 
> We made the decision of not pushing our queue for -rc3 because Linus
> specifically wanted only critical fixes for -rc3.  We will push it for
> -rc4 for when Linus returns.
> 
> Also, you may want to consider moderating your tone.
> 

I did not meant any disrespect. I totally understand, I meant it as a
a team member, that wants to help. I deeply regret if I offended you
in any way, please forgive me.

And, for My uml it is a very critical, "*can not* boot without", patch.
I wish it could be pushed apart from any other patchset.

Thanks
Boaz

quoted text
> 	-hpa
> 

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/