On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:33:43 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:46:53AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > It makes more sense to have the device increment tx_droppped, 
> > and return NETDEV_TX_OK. Skip the message (or make it a pr_debug()). 
> > Network devices do not guarantee packet delivery, and if out of
> > resources then holding more data in the
> > queue is going to hurt not help the situation.

Yes, actually oom should be a ratelimited message and TX_OK, the other
case is a "should never happen" logic bug which warrants an error and
I don't care what it returns (whatever's easiest).

Please fix both at once since you're touching it.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/