On 06/25, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
quoted text
>
> Oleg Nesterov [oleg@redhat.com] wrote:
> | On 06/25, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> | >
> | > Louis Rilling [Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com] wrote:
> | > | - proc_pid_readdir():
> | > |   Needs similar check and protection to proc_pid_lookup(), but there is another
> | > |   issue: next_tgid() can find a dying task:
> | >
> | > Hmm, I thought proc_pid_readdir() would be a problem too but convinced myself
> | > that it would not - since a process running proc_pid_readdir() would have
> | > a reference to the pid namespace,
> |
> | Where does this reference comes from ?
>
> Caller of proc_pid_readdir() would be living in the same pid namespace right ?

Afaics, in general not.

Suppose that we do something like

	if (!clone(CLONE_NEWPID)) {
		mount("none", "/SUB_PROC", "proc", 0, NULL);
		exit();
	}

After that /SUB_PROC/ still exists, one can do "ls /SUB_PROC/".

This particular case is fine, ns->child_reaper was already cleared.
But, as Louis pointed out, ls can race with the exiting init.

quoted text
> | But I won't be surprised if I am wrong again ;)

Yes ;)

Oleg.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/