On 06/28/2010 05:38 AM, David Howells wrote:
quoted text
> Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> In this case the safest approach(in my mind) would be to just
>> mark the integer __unused. Keep in mind though Im not certain
>> if this is the right place for this value i.e. will this effect
>> *instkey or not(please check).
>
> This is the wrong approach.  Either the variable should be got rid of, or it
> should be used to replace all the other calls to key_ref_to_ptr() in
> keyctl_describe_key().
>
> David
>

I see your patch you sent for this.. vary nice!

Thanks!

Justin P. Mattock
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/