>On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:09, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:
>> On 06/09/2010 11:04 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>>>
>>> Obviously UML cannot stomach callee reg-saving trickery
>>> introduced with d61931d89be506372d01a90d1755f6d0a9fafe2d
>>> (x86: Add optimized popcnt variants) and oopses during boot:
>>>
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127522065202435&w=2
>>>
>>> Redirect arch_hweight.h include from the x86 portion to the generic
>>> arch_hweight.h which is a fallback to the software hweight routines.
>>>
>>> LKML-Reference: <201005271944.09541.toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>
>Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
>> who's going to push this ASAP. I was just (again) 3/4 through a bisect
>> on 2.6.35-rc2. When I finally realized "Hey that patch, I forgot".
>> (My concentration is not what it used to be)
>>
>> Please push this, someone
>
>Peter, are you happy with this?
>Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix a
>regression in post-2.6.34.
>
