Re: BUG: Securityfs and bind mounts (2.6.34)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010 - 8:32 am

On Thursday 08 Jul 2010 16:20:59 Greg KH wrote:

Just do double check what you are saying, securityfs is not safe for use from
modules? If so I would then recommend removing the exports otherwise it is an
invitation to shoot yourself into the foot. Also, in-three TPM driver can be
built as a module so how does that work?

Tvrtko

Sophos Plc, The Pentagon, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, United Kingdom.
Company Reg No 2096520. VAT Reg No GB 348 3873 20.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
BUG: Securityfs and bind mounts (2.6.34), Tvrtko Ursulin, (Thu Jul 8, 3:12 am)
Re: BUG: Securityfs and bind mounts (2.6.34), Greg KH, (Thu Jul 8, 7:43 am)
Re: BUG: Securityfs and bind mounts (2.6.34), Tvrtko Ursulin, (Thu Jul 8, 7:55 am)
Re: BUG: Securityfs and bind mounts (2.6.34), Greg KH, (Thu Jul 8, 8:20 am)
Re: BUG: Securityfs and bind mounts (2.6.34), Tvrtko Ursulin, (Thu Jul 8, 8:32 am)
Re: BUG: Securityfs and bind mounts (2.6.34), Greg KH, (Thu Jul 8, 8:46 am)
Re: BUG: Securityfs and bind mounts (2.6.34), Tvrtko Ursulin, (Thu Jul 8, 9:14 am)
Re: BUG: Securityfs and bind mounts (2.6.34), Tvrtko Ursulin, (Wed Jul 14, 9:19 am)