Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running perfctrs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Don Zickus
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 2:20 pm

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:24:58AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

The only problem is only one counter is overflowing in these cases, so we
would have to do it all the time, which may not be hard.  But I was
thinking of something similar.

For now, I am trying to force counter0 off, seeing that most of the perf
errata on nehalem have been on counter0.  Or maybe I can get 'perf top' to
use something other than counter0 by running 'perf record' first?

Cheers,
Don

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with ..., Don Zickus, (Wed Aug 25, 2:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with ..., Frederic Weisbecker, (Wed Aug 25, 4:52 pm)