Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2010 » August » 26

Re: [PATCH 5/5] net/netfilter/ipvs: Eliminate memory leak

Previous thread: [PATCH] tracing/trace_stack: Fix stack trace on ppc64 by Anton Blanchard on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 - 6:32 pm. (7 messages)

Next thread: [PATCH v2] lib: fix scnprintf() if @size is == 0 by Changli Gao on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 - 6:41 pm. (1 message)
[view original message]
From: Simon Horman
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net/netfilter/ipvs: Eliminate memory leak
Date: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 - 6:34 pm

Thanks Julia, that looks good to me.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>

--


[ message continues ]
[view original message]
From: David Miller
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net/netfilter/ipvs: Eliminate memory leak
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 4:38 pm

From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>

Since Patrick appears to be offline, I'll apply this directly so
he has less to do when he comes back online :)

Thanks.
--


[ message continues ]
[view original message]
From: Simon Horman
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net/netfilter/ipvs: Eliminate memory leak
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 5:32 pm

I have a handful of other changes queued up,
do you want to take them too?

--


[ message continues ]
[view original message]
From: David Miller
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net/netfilter/ipvs: Eliminate memory leak
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 8:56 pm

From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>

Sure, let's do that.
--


[ message continues ]
[view original message]
From: Patrick McHardy
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net/netfilter/ipvs: Eliminate memory leak
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 - 10:42 pm

Thanks Dave. I should be done catching up by tonight and will start
taking care of IPVS patches again.
--


[ message continues ]
Previous thread: [PATCH] tracing/trace_stack: Fix stack trace on ppc64 by Anton Blanchard on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 - 6:32 pm. (7 messages)

Next thread: [PATCH v2] lib: fix scnprintf() if @size is == 0 by Changli Gao on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 - 6:41 pm. (1 message)