From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:09:55 +0900
quoted text > Probably my example is not so good. That's not my point.
> In the example application, client and server socket is in the same process.
> But it's NOT generic. usually, client and server are another process. then,
> client can't expect when server close socket.
>
> The most big matter is, this is can't be avoided in userland. In addition,
> EVERY application don't want application hang up. we don't hesitate
> userland change.
Ok, you and Ben Hutchings have convinced me to reconsider.
And this matches what even BSD4.4-Lite does (I checked yesterday before
my initial reply), so I will apply this patch.
Thanks for your patience.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] tcp: select(writefds) don't hang up when a pee ... , David Miller , (Wed Aug 25, 8:51 pm)