Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Monday, January 3, 2011 - 10:24 pm

Hello,

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:35:45PM -0600, Kanigeri, Hari wrote:

Using dedicated workqueue or system_wq doesn't make any difference in
terms of execution latency anymore.  Sleeping work items no longer
delay execution of other work items.  If mailbox is very latency
sensitive, it might make sense to create a HIGHPRI workqueue but that
usually isn't necessary.

Thank you.

--
tejun
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox, Tejun Heo, (Mon Jan 3, 6:49 am)
[PATCH 11/32] v4l/cx18: update workqueue usage, Tejun Heo, (Mon Jan 3, 6:49 am)
[PATCH 25/32] ext4: convert to alloc_workqueue(), Tejun Heo, (Mon Jan 3, 6:49 am)
[PATCH 28/32] xfs: convert to alloc_workqueue(), Tejun Heo, (Mon Jan 3, 6:49 am)
Re: [PATCH 20/32] video/msm_fb: use system_wq instead of d ..., Stanislaw Gruszka, (Mon Jan 3, 10:06 am)
Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox, Kanigeri, Hari, (Mon Jan 3, 2:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 11/32] v4l/cx18: update workqueue usage, Andy Walls, (Mon Jan 3, 5:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox, Tejun Heo, (Mon Jan 3, 10:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH 11/32] v4l/cx18: update workqueue usage, Andy Walls, (Tue Jan 4, 6:21 am)