> On 2011-01-04, at 11:21,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:56:58 +0800, yangsheng said:
> >> If atime has been wrong set to future, then it cannot
> >> be updated back to current time.
> >>
> >> +#define RELATIME_MARGIN (24 * 60 * 60)
> >
> > Nice patch overall. Should this be a #define, or a CONFIG_ variable,
> > or a tweakable /proc/sys/fs variable? Or am I senile and we thrashed
> > all this out once before when the relatime code landed?
>
> I recall the consensus was that a /proc tunable was "too much" for the
> initial patch.
