On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:54:08PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
quoted text
>
> If I get it right peek + dequeue should do all current dequeue logic
> plus additionally write down the child qdisc or skb (leaves) info,
> plus, probably, some ifs btw., which looks like a bit of overhead,
> if we consider requeuing as something exceptional. Unless we don't -
> then of course something like this could be useful.

I don't see the overhead in writing down something that we alrady
have.  In any case, do you have an alternative solution to the
current problem that qdisc_run looks at an arbitrary queue's
status to decide whether it should process a qdisc that empties
into n queues?

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html