Re: xfrm_state locking regression...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Timo Teräs
Date: Monday, September 22, 2008 - 11:25 pm

Herbert Xu wrote:

Something like this. I just compile tested, so I'm not sure if it
actually works.

This basically reverts the GC changes. The interesting bits are in
xfrm_state_delete(). It will _hold() the ->next entry unless we
were at last entry. This will make sure that when an entry is
in XFRM_STATE_DEAD the all.next is valid all the way until the
entry is destroyed.

The corresponding put is in _destroy(). Added it as a final thing
to do so hopefully compiler optimizes tail recursion to iteration.
(Seemed to do that in my case.)

And finally, _walk() was right all along. It returns to dumping
and first skips all dead entries. And just before return, when
all dead entries are already skipped the originally held entry
is _put(). That _put call (or the one in _walk_done()) will result
all dead entries that were held, to be iteratively put.

- Timo

diff --git a/include/linux/netlink.h b/include/linux/netlink.h
index cbba776..9ff1b54 100644
--- a/include/linux/netlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/netlink.h
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ struct netlink_callback
 	int		(*dump)(struct sk_buff * skb, struct netlink_callback *cb);
 	int		(*done)(struct netlink_callback *cb);
 	int		family;
-	long		args[7];
+	long		args[6];
 };
 
 struct netlink_notify
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index 48630b2..d5cba7b 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ struct xfrm_state
 {
 	struct list_head	all;
 	union {
-		struct list_head	gclist;
+		struct hlist_node	gclist;
 		struct hlist_node	bydst;
 	};
 	struct hlist_node	bysrc;
@@ -1246,8 +1246,6 @@ struct xfrm6_tunnel {
 };
 
 struct xfrm_state_walk {
-	struct list_head list;
-	unsigned long genid;
 	struct xfrm_state *state;
 	int count;
 	u8 proto;
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 053970e..f45f006 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -59,14 +59,6 @@ static unsigned int xfrm_state_hashmax __read_mostly = 1 * 1024 * 1024;
 static unsigned int xfrm_state_num;
 static unsigned int xfrm_state_genid;
 
-/* Counter indicating ongoing walk, protected by xfrm_state_lock. */
-static unsigned long xfrm_state_walk_ongoing;
-/* Counter indicating walk completion, protected by xfrm_cfg_mutex. */
-static unsigned long xfrm_state_walk_completed;
-
-/* List of outstanding state walks used to set the completed counter.  */
-static LIST_HEAD(xfrm_state_walks);
-
 static struct xfrm_state_afinfo *xfrm_state_get_afinfo(unsigned int family);
 static void xfrm_state_put_afinfo(struct xfrm_state_afinfo *afinfo);
 
@@ -199,8 +191,7 @@ static DEFINE_RWLOCK(xfrm_state_afinfo_lock);
 static struct xfrm_state_afinfo *xfrm_state_afinfo[NPROTO];
 
 static struct work_struct xfrm_state_gc_work;
-static LIST_HEAD(xfrm_state_gc_leftovers);
-static LIST_HEAD(xfrm_state_gc_list);
+static HLIST_HEAD(xfrm_state_gc_list);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xfrm_state_gc_lock);
 
 int __xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x);
@@ -412,23 +403,17 @@ static void xfrm_state_gc_destroy(struct xfrm_state *x)
 
 static void xfrm_state_gc_task(struct work_struct *data)
 {
-	struct xfrm_state *x, *tmp;
-	unsigned long completed;
+	struct xfrm_state *x;
+	struct hlist_node *entry, *tmp;
+	struct hlist_head gc_list;
 
-	mutex_lock(&xfrm_cfg_mutex);
 	spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_gc_lock);
-	list_splice_tail_init(&xfrm_state_gc_list, &xfrm_state_gc_leftovers);
+	gc_list.first = xfrm_state_gc_list.first;
+	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&xfrm_state_gc_list);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&xfrm_state_gc_lock);
 
-	completed = xfrm_state_walk_completed;
-	mutex_unlock(&xfrm_cfg_mutex);
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(x, tmp, &xfrm_state_gc_leftovers, gclist) {
-		if ((long)(x->lastused - completed) > 0)
-			break;
-		list_del(&x->gclist);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(x, entry, tmp, &gc_list, gclist)
 		xfrm_state_gc_destroy(x);
-	}
 
 	wake_up(&km_waitq);
 }
@@ -553,12 +538,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_alloc);
 
 void __xfrm_state_destroy(struct xfrm_state *x)
 {
+	struct xfrm_state *next = NULL;
+
 	WARN_ON(x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_DEAD);
 
+	if (x->all.next != &xfrm_state_all)
+		next = container_of(x->all.next, struct xfrm_state, all);
 	spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_gc_lock);
-	list_add_tail(&x->gclist, &xfrm_state_gc_list);
+	hlist_add_head(&x->gclist, &xfrm_state_gc_list);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&xfrm_state_gc_lock);
 	schedule_work(&xfrm_state_gc_work);
+
+	if (next != NULL)
+		xfrm_state_put(next);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__xfrm_state_destroy);
 
@@ -569,8 +561,10 @@ int __xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
 	if (x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_DEAD) {
 		x->km.state = XFRM_STATE_DEAD;
 		spin_lock(&xfrm_state_lock);
-		x->lastused = xfrm_state_walk_ongoing;
 		list_del_rcu(&x->all);
+		if (x->all.next != &xfrm_state_all)
+			xfrm_state_hold(container_of(x->all.next,
+						     struct xfrm_state, all));
 		hlist_del(&x->bydst);
 		hlist_del(&x->bysrc);
 		if (x->id.spi)
@@ -1612,33 +1606,15 @@ void xfrm_state_walk_init(struct xfrm_state_walk *walk, u8 proto)
 	walk->proto = proto;
 	walk->state = NULL;
 	walk->count = 0;
-	list_add_tail(&walk->list, &xfrm_state_walks);
-	walk->genid = ++xfrm_state_walk_ongoing;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_walk_init);
 
 void xfrm_state_walk_done(struct xfrm_state_walk *walk)
 {
-	struct list_head *prev;
-
 	if (walk->state != NULL) {
 		xfrm_state_put(walk->state);
 		walk->state = NULL;
 	}
-
-	prev = walk->list.prev;
-	list_del(&walk->list);
-
-	if (prev != &xfrm_state_walks) {
-		list_entry(prev, struct xfrm_state_walk, list)->genid =
-			walk->genid;
-		return;
-	}
-
-	xfrm_state_walk_completed = walk->genid;
-
-	if (!list_empty(&xfrm_state_gc_leftovers))
-		schedule_work(&xfrm_state_gc_work);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_walk_done);
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 2, 7:51 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 2, 8:00 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 2, 10:01 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 2, 10:07 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 2, 10:23 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 2, 10:39 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 2, 10:39 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 2, 10:40 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 2, 10:45 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 2, 10:50 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 2, 11:10 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 2, 11:14 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 2, 11:27 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 2, 11:35 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 2, 11:45 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 2, 11:47 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Wed Sep 3, 12:14 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Fri Sep 5, 4:55 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Mon Sep 8, 5:09 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Mon Sep 8, 5:18 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Mon Sep 8, 5:20 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Mon Sep 8, 5:25 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 5:25 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 9, 7:33 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 1:20 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 8:01 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 8:04 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 9, 8:15 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 8:22 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 9, 8:23 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 8:38 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 9, 9:01 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 9:06 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 9, 9:22 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 9:24 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 9:48 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 9:52 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 9, 9:53 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 9, 10:16 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 10:21 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Tue Sep 9, 10:23 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 9, 10:46 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Paul E. McKenney, (Thu Sep 11, 2:24 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Thu Sep 11, 3:00 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Paul E. McKenney, (Thu Sep 11, 4:22 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Fri Sep 12, 9:08 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Paul E. McKenney, (Fri Sep 12, 10:37 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Sun Sep 21, 5:29 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Sun Sep 21, 8:21 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Mon Sep 22, 4:42 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Mon Sep 22, 6:01 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Mon Sep 22, 4:50 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 7:48 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Mon Sep 22, 9:53 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Mon Sep 22, 9:59 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Mon Sep 22, 10:17 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Mon Sep 22, 10:22 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Mon Sep 22, 11:25 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Mon Sep 22, 11:47 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Mon Sep 22, 11:56 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 2:39 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 4:24 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 5:08 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 5:14 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 5:25 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 5:56 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 6:01 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 6:07 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 6:30 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 6:32 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 6:46 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 9:23 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 10:14 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 10:15 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 10:46 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 10:55 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 11:04 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 11:13 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Tue Sep 23, 11:20 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 11:21 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Wed Sep 24, 12:29 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Wed Sep 24, 12:54 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Wed Sep 24, 6:18 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Wed Sep 24, 7:08 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Wed Sep 24, 11:03 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Thu Sep 25, 12:57 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Thu Sep 25, 1:42 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Thu Sep 25, 1:56 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Thu Sep 25, 2:01 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Thu Sep 25, 2:49 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Thu Sep 25, 5:12 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Timo Teräs, (Thu Sep 25, 5:36 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Thu Sep 25, 7:08 pm)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., David Miller, (Wed Oct 1, 3:07 am)
Re: xfrm_state locking regression..., Herbert Xu, (Wed Oct 1, 7:05 am)