Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 - 12:48 pm

* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:


thanks. The argument is invalid:


All tooling (in fact _more_ tooling) can be done based on generic, 
TRACE_EVENT() based tracepoints. Generic tracepoints are far more 
available, have a generalized format with format parsers and user 
tooling implemented, etc. etc.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 11, 12:15 pm)
RE: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Tue Aug 11, 5:02 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Aug 26, 12:48 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Frederic Weisbecker, (Wed Aug 26, 4:46 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 26, 5:34 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 26, 5:35 pm)