Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Neil Horman
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 - 4:23 pm

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 07:05:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

Ok, thats fine by me.  I really don't have any oposition to just using raw
TRACE_EVENTS for my current purposes, but as Ingo's previous mail shows, theres
_alot_ to it.  Using the ftrace interface was really, in the end, just simpler
for me.  But if just using TRACE_EVENT is the way it needs to be, so be it.

Dave, would you please revert commit 9ec04da7489d2c9ae01ea6e9b5fa313ccf3d35fb
and 5a165657bef7c47e5ff4cd138f7758ef6278e87b?  That should remove the ftrace
code, and leave the TRACE_EVENT tracepoint for skb_copy_datagram_to_iovec in
place.  I'll submit a patch in the next few days to augment the TRACE_EVENT
format to export all the data that I need.

Thanks!
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 11, 12:15 pm)
RE: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Tue Aug 11, 5:02 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Neil Horman, (Wed Aug 26, 4:23 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Frederic Weisbecker, (Wed Aug 26, 4:46 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 26, 5:34 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 26, 5:35 pm)