On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:18:54AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:28:55AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
...
quoted text
> > qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> >  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> >  rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> > 
> > 
> > Same name "eth0" is displayed, that might confuse parsers...
> > 
> > What naming convention should we choose for multiqueue devices ?
> > 
> 
> Hmm... anything could break here something for somebody, so there is
> still a (Patrick's) question if not sum it all? Otherwise, I wonder
> about using the qdisc handle (tcm_handle>>16): there would be at
> least one "pfifo_fast 0:" looking like proper root for somebody...

I meant "proper" for pfifo_fast. On the other hand, I wonder why these
multiqueue qdisc handles can't be really given such unique per dev
(instead of per queue) handles?

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html