Re: Is it a possible bug in dev_gro_receive()?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jarek Poplawski
Date: Monday, August 2, 2010 - 3:29 am

Xin Xiaohui wrote:

I think, you're right, but fixing memmove looks nicer to me:

 -	--skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags);
 +	--skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags * sizeof(skb_frag_t));

Jarek P.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Is it a possible bug in dev_gro_receive()?, Jarek Poplawski, (Mon Aug 2, 3:29 am)
Re: Is it a possible bug in dev_gro_receive()?, Herbert Xu, (Mon Aug 2, 4:04 am)
RE: Is it a possible bug in dev_gro_receive()?, Xin, Xiaohui, (Mon Aug 2, 7:33 pm)
Re: Is it a possible bug in dev_gro_receive()?, Jarek Poplawski, (Mon Aug 2, 11:45 pm)
RE: Is it a possible bug in dev_gro_receive()?, Xin, Xiaohui, (Tue Aug 10, 1:11 am)
Re: Is it a possible bug in dev_gro_receive()?, Jarek Poplawski, (Tue Aug 10, 1:34 am)
[PATCH] net: Fix a memmove bug in dev_gro_receive(), Jarek Poplawski, (Wed Aug 11, 5:02 am)
Re: [PATCH] net: Fix a memmove bug in dev_gro_receive(), David Miller, (Tue Aug 17, 5:37 pm)