[ Details snipped ]
Thanks for your guess, Eric.
Unfortunately, that didn't change anything.
According to the documentation at
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.kernel.html
that parameter is to prevent _responses_ leaving through a different
interface that the original packet came in on. So, I wouldn't expect it
to have any impact on _routed packets_.
In my original e-mail, I forgot to mention something I noticed while
debugging:
If i put the bridge into promiscuous mode, then suddenly the packets are
routed.
# ip link set promisc on dev virbr1
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
*Sebastian J. Bronner*
Administrator
D9T GmbH - Magirusstr. 39/1 - D-89077 Ulm
Tel: +49 731 1411 696-0 - Fax: +49 731 3799-220
Geschäftsführer: Daniel Kraft
Sitz und Register: Ulm, HRB 722416
Ust.IdNr: DE 260484638
http://d9t.de - D9T High Performance Hosting
info@d9t.de
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author] Next message: [thread] [date] [author]