On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

quoted text
> On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 22:27:11 +0100
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> While playing with SFQ and other AQM, I was bothered to see how easy it
>> was for a single tcp flow to 'fill the pipe' and consume lot of memory
>> buffers in queues. I know Jesper use more than 50.000 SFQ on his
>> routers, and with GRO packets this can consume a lot of memory.

That is true, operations department went kind of crazy when they started 
to add/move customers to our new Nehalem Xeon 5550 systems.  I have 
stopped them now ;-)

The use of an SFQ per customer, actually also solves the buffer bloat 
issue for our customers...


quoted text
>> I played a bit adding ECN in SFQ, first by marking packets for a
>> particular flow if this flow qlen was above a given threshold, and later
>> using another trick : ECN mark packet if it stayed longer than a given
>> delay in the queue. This of course could be done on other modules, what
>> do you think ?

This is very interesting stuff! :-)

Are you inspired by Jim Gettys buffer bloat discussions?

quoted text
> ...
> You might want to look into CHOKe and ECSFQ which are other AQM models
> that have shown up in research.

Have you looked at the SFB (Stochastic Fair Blue) implementation by 
Juliusz Chroboczek?

http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/sfb/

Cheers,
   Jesper Brouer

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MSc. Master of Computer Science
Dept. of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen
Author of http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html