On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:27:17PM -0700, Peter Kieser wrote:
For what it's worth... that head parking feature actually saves a
measurable amount of power. On my system, with four drives, there
is about a 10 watt (AC) difference between all four heads parked and
all four heads non-parked. This finding is consistent with the
power numbers suggested by SilentPCReview's reviews of these drives.
This will prevent the rapidly increasing Load Cycle Count SMART
counter. However, in my opinion, it also removes a useful
power-saving feature of these drives. In other words, my system is
mostly idle; I want the heads to be parked the majority of the time.
Instead, without the wdidle3 hack, they constantly park/unpark
despite an otherwise idle system.
Here's the problem I've been unable to solve: if my system is truly
idle for, say 10 minutes, then why don't my heads stay parked for 10
minutes? It appears that the heads will park, then five minutes
later, *something mysterious* will cause them to unpark.
I did some experimenting with this several months ago. See the
list archives for August 20, 2009, subject "linux disk access when
idle"[1].
As far as I can tell, I disabled every single daemon on my system,
but still could not get the heads to park for more than five
minutes.
My point in all this is: I'd rather tune my software (Linux) to work
better with my hardware, rather than remove what I consider to be a
useful power-saving feature. I haven't re-visisted this in a while,
but last time I tried, I couldn't find the guilty daemon or kernel
setting responsible for the constant head un-parking.
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=125078611926294&w=2
-Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html