I hear this said, but I don't have any data to back it up. Drive vendors
aren't stupid, so if the parking feature is likely to cause premature
failures under warranty, I would expect that the feature would not be
there, or that the drive would be made more robust. Maybe I have too
much faith in greed as a design goal, but I have to wonder if load
cycles are as destructive as seems to be the assumption.
I'd love to find some real data, anecdotal stories about older drives
are not overly helpful. Clearly there is a trade-off between energy
saving, response, and durability, I just don't have any data from a
large population of new (green) drives.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We can't solve today's problems by using the same thinking we
used in creating them." - Einstein
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html