On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 12:01:17AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
It is a lot less of a hack than what went before.
The only other option would be an actual (working) union mount,
and that has much bigger problems - not to mention needing
process specific mount tables!
OTOH I do wish the 32bit/64bit compatibility had been done as part of
the '64bit' port - so that the 64bit userspace doesn't have to rename
anything from the 32bit version - giving you a userpace that can
(at least in theory) boot either a 32bit or 64bit kernel.
David
--
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author] Next message: [thread] [date] [author]