On 10/24/07, carlopmart wrote:
Not unless someone actually writes the code to do it. Notice the
extreme number of people with openbsd.org email addresses jumping up
and down, volunteering to do it (hint: none). Possibly not even if
someone writes the code. Diffs are not always merged. They should be
good diffs that improve OpenBSD. Notice the number of people with
openbsd.org email addresses who are not convinced that doing this a)
will improve OpenBSD and b) won't actually hurt.
So I'm going to guess the answer is "No, integrating xen
paravirtualization is not a project priority at this time. Also, where
are your diffs?"
CK
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
