Re: Non-x86

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Lars Noodén
Subject: Re: Non-x86
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 9:17 am

Ted Unangst wrote:
CALEA requires wiretapping capabilities in networking hardware.  You
know that.  AMT provides wiretapping capabilities, though not by name.

What is unclear is how much those CALEA requirements extend to more
generic computing platforms and even operating systems.

AMT, from Intel's own pages, seems for all practical purposes a
hard-coded rootkit useful for surveillance, among other things.  Thus
the connection to CALEA.

So, are backdoors like AMT required for all motherboards now?
If so, what are the details?
If not, what non-x86 options are available for regular workstations and
servers.  There's a shitload available for embedded devices and such.
Where are the choices for non-x86?

-Lars
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Mon Oct 22, 1:05 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Nick Guenther, (Mon Oct 22, 12:11 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Jeff Quast, (Mon Oct 22, 3:07 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Tue Oct 23, 12:07 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Luca Corti, (Tue Oct 23, 1:03 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Per-Erik Persson, (Tue Oct 23, 2:00 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Lars Noodén, (Tue Oct 23, 3:45 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Lars Hansson, (Tue Oct 23, 3:56 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Henning Brauer, (Tue Oct 23, 5:19 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Ted Unangst, (Tue Oct 23, 9:39 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., adam.getchell, (Tue Oct 23, 5:57 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. , Theo de Raadt, (Tue Oct 23, 6:14 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. , Damien Miller, (Tue Oct 23, 6:25 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Ben Goren, (Tue Oct 23, 8:35 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Adam Getchell, (Tue Oct 23, 10:41 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Wed Oct 24, 6:38 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Douglas A. Tutty, (Wed Oct 24, 6:58 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Chris Kuethe, (Wed Oct 24, 7:14 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Wed Oct 24, 7:20 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Christoph Egger, (Wed Oct 24, 8:09 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Christoph Egger, (Wed Oct 24, 8:10 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Artur Grabowski, (Wed Oct 24, 8:25 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Christoph Egger, (Wed Oct 24, 8:33 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Wed Oct 24, 8:45 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Ted Unangst, (Wed Oct 24, 11:09 am)
Re: Non-x86, Lars Noodén, (Fri Oct 26, 12:54 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. , Carlo Gebhardt, (Fri Oct 26, 3:58 am)
Re: Non-x86, Martin Schröder, (Fri Oct 26, 4:39 am)
Re: Non-x86, mickey, (Fri Oct 26, 4:49 am)
Re: Non-x86, Ted Unangst, (Fri Oct 26, 8:28 am)
Re: Non-x86, Lars Noodén, (Fri Oct 26, 9:17 am)
Re: Non-x86, Martin Schröder, (Fri Oct 26, 9:23 am)
Re: Non-x86, Matthew Szudzik, (Fri Oct 26, 2:03 pm)
Re: Non-x86, Jeff Quast, (Sun Oct 28, 6:59 am)
Re: Non-x86, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sun Oct 28, 8:27 am)
Re: Non-x86, Lars Noodén, (Mon Oct 29, 9:53 am)
Re: Non-x86, Douglas A. Tutty, (Mon Oct 29, 2:47 pm)
Re: Non-x86, Matthew Szudzik, (Tue Oct 30, 11:26 am)