> >> Where are the choices for non-x86?
I agree that sparc64 is currently the best alternative to the x86
architecture in i386 and amd64. For me, the biggest obstacles to
buying a sparc64 machine are:
* sparc64 machines the are significantly more expensive than their x86
counterparts.
* There is no binary emulator that would allow me to run proprietary
software like Mathematica on sparc64. (In contrast, I can run Mathematica
on i386 with the Linux binary emulator.)
NetBSD has a Solaris binary emulator for sparc64, so with a little work it
might be possible to remove this second obstacle.
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
