..maybe you should look into the OpenBSD project, methods, and the endRMS,
Given what I've read, listened to, and specifically what you've said here:
> From what I have heard, OpenBSD does not contain non-free software
> I could recommend OpenBSD privately with a clear conscience to someone
the ultimate freedom is that of free choice. As I've seen, the OpenBSD
developers have fought tooth-and-nail, in many cases to the bitter
end, to provide the cleanest and freest operating system available. It
is coherent, and cohesive. In some cases, it's frustrating, simply
because support for non-free entities are sketchy or flat-out aren't
available. But at the same time, the opportunity remains open for
folks to implement their non-free whatevers if they so choose, though
they probably won't get the support of the developers, they may get
support from other users.. all of us are working with varying levels
of conviction and outside influences. That being said, I believe those
of the developers, many openbsd users, are stricter and more focused
any other single group of computer users.
again.. my words come from my perspective, from what I've heard/read
on this list and across the internet, as well as my experiences in
using windows, linux, *BSD, and seeing the effects of these sorts of
issues even in the non-technical areas of our lives.
So again.. I think OpenBSD should be tried and explored before being labeled.
Thank you for your time,
~Jason
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
| Joe Peterson | Re: 2.6.25.3: su gets stuck for root |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Emil S Tantilov | Re: WARNING: at include/net/sock.h:417 udp_lib_unhash |
