On Dec 11, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Including a program by name in the ports system does suggest using
Where is your line in the sand? When does an operating system become
free by your interpretation? When non-free ports frameworks are
hosted outside the official OpenBSD cvs repository? On a server not
owned by the OpenBSD project? What if I want to host it on my own
server, but I also happen to be an OpenBSD developer? When does the
disassociation satisfy your unpublished requirements?
Your interpretation is vague and self-serving.
---
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Daniel Eischen | Re: error with thread |
