On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Including a program by name in the ports system does suggest using
If a library has a book on [insert-controversial-topic-here], does that
imply endorsement of said topic by the library or by someone who reads the
book? Should the library burn copies of books on such topics to protect
the citizenry? Absolutely not.
Along these same lines, it doesn't make sense to try to hide what software
is out there. I think people can figure out which software they want to
use from ports after installing the base system, free or non-free.
Either way, a makefile to download and install a non-free piece of
software doesn't make the system any less free.
--
Kyle George
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
| Joe Peterson | Re: 2.6.25.3: su gets stuck for root |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Emil S Tantilov | Re: WARNING: at include/net/sock.h:417 udp_lib_unhash |
