-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1Hi,
This is what I felt; All comments are welcome.
If both parties were at fault for somehow giving the user the wrong
idea that flash player is great on BSD OR windows is great coz it runs
emacs, is this the right way to settle it?The honest way is to removing these Makefiles/binaries wherever (if
you really want to encourage free software).
The wicked way is to keep these at the expense of popularity but not
complain about it.
The worst way is to fight about it.Now if one of you didn't do what the other said, that one would be the
bad guy. But if both of you decided to keep these things as they are,
both would be against free software.Which one would you rather be?
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.orgiD8DBQFHYb5TRzTnZfDdIE8RAiE2AJwOkj2Jl9Ls/t9cIdTgoxJ0W4M8OwCfcCGP
9IKozlMUHm4u5N4LI2UYdTs=
=pSrc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Daniel Eischen | Re: error with thread |
