| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Damien Miller | Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
also, does it work if you try connecting without any keys in your ssh-agent?
...
| Feb 27, 4:42 pm 2007 |
| Damien Miller | Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
Please send a Debug3 trace (sshd -dddp222), debug level 1 doesn't
contain all the necessary information
-d
| Feb 27, 4:20 pm 2007 |
| Damien Miller | Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
what does the client say? (ssh -vvvp 222 localhost)
| Feb 27, 4:41 pm 2007 |
| Josh Grosse | Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
Oops, forgot to add my dmesg. This kernel is GENERIC+RAIDFrame:
OpenBSD 4.1-beta (JGGIMI) #14: Sun Feb 25 13:36:43 EST 2007
josh@jggimi.homeip.net:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/JGGIMI
cpu0: AMD Sempron(tm) 2600+ ("AuthenticAMD" 686-class, 256KB L2 cache) 1.84 GHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
real mem = 502820864 (491036K)
avail mem = 450584576 (440024K)
using 4278 buffers containing 25264128 bytes (24672K) of memory
mainbus0 ...
| Feb 27, 3:41 pm 2007 |
| Josh Grosse | ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped workin ...
After building -current on Feb 25, I noticed when I attempted to use S/Key
remotely, that it was not a permitted authentication style. (I use S/Key
when publc key authentication is not available, so it may have nothing to do
with recent changes to how sshd_config Match works, and may be something else
entirely, I have not used S/Key in a few weeks.)
Trying to recreate the problem, I ran sshd in debug mode, and ssh -vvv;
it looks like the authentication method isn't viable.
I'm hoping ...
| Feb 27, 3:38 pm 2007 |
| Josh Grosse | Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
debug2: load_server_config: filename /etc/ssh/sshd_config
debug2: load_server_config: done config len = 268
debug2: parse_server_config: config /etc/ssh/sshd_config len 268
debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:12 setting PermitRootLogin no
debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:13 setting PasswordAuthentication no
debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:14 setting ClientAliveInterval 15
debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:15 setting ClientAliveCountMax 3
debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:16 setting X11Forwarding yes
debug3: ...
| Feb 27, 4:33 pm 2007 |
| Alejandro Lozanoff | HP Prolliant DL320 G4 -SAS- Supported?
Hi list,
I was wondering if anyone has tried this machine succesfully?
The SmarArray P800 is supported on 4.0 (and the P400 and e200 seems to
have been added to 4.1), altough ciss(4) doesnt mention SAS on the 4.0
version, only SATA. Is it the same? The nic exact model isnt listed on
bge(4) but it might just work. I dont know about the rest of the stuff,
chipsets, motherboard, sensors, etc.
If it doesnt work it'll be the same as paperweight, so i want to be sure
before buying.
Thanks in ...
| Feb 27, 3:05 pm 2007 |
| Gustavo Rios | Re: HP Prolliant DL320 G4 -SAS- Supported?
I am interested too.
| Feb 27, 3:10 pm 2007 |
| Berk D. Demir | Re: spamd-white
You won't be playing with spamd-white table except for testing.
You should declare your whitelist to spamd.conf
white:\
:white:\
:method=file:\
spamd exactly executes the command
pfctl -p /dev/pf -q -t spamd-white -T replace -f -
As stated above, please use spamd.conf
man 5 spamd.conf will help much.
| Feb 27, 3:24 pm 2007 |
| RW | Re: spamd-white
Try looking at /etc/spamd.conf (the default copy from install)
Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?
| Feb 27, 3:20 pm 2007 |
| Tom Bombadil | spamd-white
Greetings...
By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I add manually to spamd-white?
spamd(8) says:
"spamd regularly scans the /var/db/spamd database and configures all
whitelist addresses as the spamd-white pf(4) table."
How exactly does spamd configure spamd-white table?
The objective is to safely add my own IPs to the whitelist.
Thanks :)
| Feb 27, 2:55 pm 2007 |
| Gordon Ross | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
Buy a CD set http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html ;-)
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a
Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on Gentoo
Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD as guest even though
their website states that it is possible. My main question is how to
create an OBSD image since it seems that I need an ISO image.
| Feb 27, 1:31 pm 2007 |
| Paul Pruett | Re: same version upgrade i386 to amd64 gotchas?
I have received several assurances that
-current may have resolved some weirds
for i386 on amd64 processors...
With hesitation I could try jumping to current
instead of stable amd64.
I have used -current on productin before,
but only after verifying the ports could
make w/o fubars
Either amd64 stable or i386 current
I'll still should remake the ports to match,
especially openldap and cyrus-imapd and
verify. :(
| Feb 27, 1:14 pm 2007 |
| Wade, Daniel | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
Something like this?
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.0/i386/cd40.iso
| Feb 27, 12:46 pm 2007 |
| Darren Spruell | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
You can't boot off of your CDROM?
As for images, you can installer images in CDROM format and floppy
format off of the FTP mirrors.
--
Darren Spruell
phatbuckett@gmail.com
| Feb 27, 12:34 pm 2007 |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
What is wrong with the iso that is on the ftp sites? Can't you finish
the install over the network?
| Feb 27, 12:35 pm 2007 |
| Darren Spruell | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
Bear in mind that this project may not be able to successfully load OpenBSD yet.
DS
| Feb 27, 4:27 pm 2007 |
| Andreas Maus | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
You can fetch a installation iso (cd40.iso) from a mirror
and install via network. Or support OpenBSD and buy the CD sets ^^
Andreas.
--
Hobbes : Shouldn't we read the instructions?
Calvin : Do I look like a sissy?
| Feb 27, 12:35 pm 2007 |
| Peter | OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a
Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on Gentoo
Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD as guest even though
their website states that it is possible. My main question is how to
create an OBSD image since it seems that I need an ISO image.
PM
| Feb 27, 12:17 pm 2007 |
| Peter | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
Are you talking about the "install ISO's" like cdrom.iso or floppy.iso?
If so, yes, I can use them. I thought I needed a full-blown release
ISO.
I am also stuck at launching the virtualbox interface itself. I get
either a segmentation fault if started using a non-priv user or
an 'authentication rejected' error if I 'su -c virtualbox'. I have
tried the usual trick of 'xhost +' as the non-priv user and then su to
root and 'virtualbox' but I get the 'cannot connect to X server' stuff.
Any ...
| Feb 27, 1:25 pm 2007 |
| Vijay Sankar | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
dd if=/dev/cdrom of=openbsd40.iso
OR
cat /dev/cdrom > openbsd40.iso
(assuming you have the OpenBSD CD in the CDROM drive)
--
Vijay Sankar
ForeTell Technologies Limited
59 Flamingo Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3J 0X6
Phone: +1 (204) 885-9535, E-Mail: vsankar@foretell.ca
| Feb 27, 3:37 pm 2007 |
| Tobias Weisserth | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
Hi there,
You can buy the OpenBSD CDs here:
http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
You can also try to do a FTP installation inside your virtual box, it should
have access to the Internet if you configured your host box correctly.
There's a tiny ISO on the FTP servers that allows you to boot into the
installation program.
Another option is to create a full ISO image yourself. Just use Google to
lookup the details. It's not difficult at all.
regards,
Tobias W.
| Feb 27, 1:02 pm 2007 |
| Albert Chin | Re: Help with 4.0 pf queueing
I only added "red" to the http queue because it was in the http queues
in the pf FAQ :)
Ok, thanks. I'm now running ftp-proxy with:
# /usr/sbin/ftp-proxy -R 192.168.10.1 -p 8022 -q queue_ftp
and I changed the queue rules to:
altq on fxp4 cbq bandwidth 1.5Mb queue \
{ queue_std, queue_ftp, queue_http }
queue queue_std bandwidth 80% priority 7 cbq(default borrow)
queue queue_ftp bandwidth 10% priority 0 cbq(borrow)
queue queue_http bandwidth 10% priority 3 cbq(borrow)
...
| Feb 27, 2:32 pm 2007 |
| Tim Kuhlman | Re: Help with 4.0 pf queueing
You are queueing on fxp1 on the external firewall. This should affect traffic
going from the external firewall to the www/ftp server, however it sounds
like you are trying to affect traffice moving the opposite direction. To
quote from the pf faq,
"Note that queueing is only useful for packets in the outbound direction. Once
a packet arrives on an interface in the inbound direction it's already too
late to queue it -- it's already consumed network bandwidth to get to the
interface that ...
| Feb 27, 12:40 pm 2007 |
| Albert Chin | Help with 4.0 pf queueing
I have the following setup:
|
| (67.95.100.16 - fxp4)
| (67.95.100.17 - fxp4)
----------------
| EXTERNAL |
| FIREWALL |
----------------
| (192.168.10.2 - fxp1)
(192.168.10.1) |
---------------- |
...
| Feb 27, 11:31 am 2007 |
| Stuart Henderson | Re: Help with 4.0 pf queueing
You're queueing on the wrong interface to restrict outgoing
traffic. This is throttling _incoming_ traffic e.g. in your example
it's throttling requests and mainly ACKs; due to RED dropping these
ACKs you're probably triggering TCP congestion-avoidance.
You can assign traffic to queues based on _state created by rules
on fxp1_ (the state table entry includes the name of the queue to
place the associated packets in). But the actual queues are for
_outgoing_ traffic so they need to be on the ...
| Feb 27, 12:57 pm 2007 |
| Albert Chin | Re: Help with 4.0 pf queueing
Thanks.
--
albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com)
| Feb 27, 1:55 pm 2007 |
| Gareth | kernel source question
This question may be more appropriate for tech@ but i thought i'd try
here first just in case.
lets say i have a bunch of #defines, for example (from
sys/dev/wscons/wsconsio.h):
/* Event type definitions. Comment for each is information in value. */
#define WSCONS_EVENT_KEY_UP 1 /* key code */
#define WSCONS_EVENT_KEY_DOWN 2 /* key code */
#define WSCONS_EVENT_ALL_KEYS_UP 3 /* void */
#define WSCONS_EVENT_MOUSE_UP 4 /* button # ...
| Feb 27, 11:23 am 2007 |
| Nick ! | Re: kernel source question
Oh no, never do that. You would then be using different flags than
code that is already compiled (using the original definitions). If you
change this and then recompile *everything* you're safe, but only so
long as you do that. It's not compatible outside of your world, so
This is the usual route taken, however why are you doing this? Mucking
with kernel #defines is sort of priviliged, because everyone has to be
kept in sync on them.
-Nick
| Feb 27, 12:32 pm 2007 |
| Stuart Henderson | Re: same version upgrade i386 to amd64 gotchas?
It's not very fun. As well as ports, you have to take care of the boot
loader; install an amd64 bsd.rd and boot loader from i386; reboot into
the new bsd.rd and you can do an upgrade install from *.tgz.
Not really recommended unless there's no alternative.
| Feb 27, 10:45 am 2007 |
| Paul Pruett | same version upgrade i386 to amd64 gotchas?
After consideration and due to weird
problems afore discussed, I will likely be
upgrading an openbsd 4.0 i386 server to
an openbsd 4.0 amd64.
Yes in retrospect I should have used the
amd64 build not the i386 build on an athlon64
cpu... But I now have a 'production '
cyrus-imapd/sendmail server that even after
make builds, changing motherboard, cpu, & memory still has a
random lockup w/ no kernel fault displayed
about once a week, ... and for that and
I would prefer to have amd64 go ...
| Feb 27, 10:03 am 2007 |
| Andreas Bihlmaier | Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
Well, April, not March, doh!
Okay so there will be some more time to make this work :)
But to quote from undeadly.org:
... fast build machines will help compiling kernels, as most of the work
takes place in the kernel and we will compile a lot of them ..
It was just targeted at THIS particular issue and the future ideas to
continue making OpenBSD (development) better/more fun.
Regards,
ahb
| Feb 27, 10:57 am 2007 |
| Bob Beck | Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
And by detracting from the important issue which is:
* We need gear in europe for f2k7 *
You manage to sidetrack something important with your hack.
So in doing so you do us a disservice rather than helping. your
hack is useless without gear to run it on. So please just
shut up and go away for a while, and bring this up at an
appropriate time. distributed kernel building does *NOT* help
this issue.
-Bob
| Feb 27, 11:43 am 2007 |
| Andreas Bihlmaier | Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
Unfortunately I have nothing financial to help out, but I see this was
the wrong time and wrong place. SORRY
I don't know if a lot of big corps (meaning the "decision making part")
is reading misc@, but if they do:
IF YOU (big corp, small corp, rich guy) ARE USING OPENBSD AND YOU ARE
TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ITS GREAT POSSIBILITIES, LOAN/DONATE BIG HARDWARE TO
GIVE THE DEVS AT LEAST A LITTLE HAND FOR WHAT THEY GIVE TO YOU!
Btw. they SHOULD know already, this was said many times over and ...
| Feb 27, 1:21 pm 2007 |
| Martin Reindl | Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
f2k7 is not in 2 weeks but from 10th to 15th April and this still does
not help with DISKSPACE and SERVERS to plug them in.
| Feb 27, 10:48 am 2007 |
| Travers Buda | Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
Jeez, I sense some hostility on misc@. Andreas, It's a nice effort,
but unfortunately, it won't support the goals of f2k7. The most
important lacking thing for the hackathon is fast, memory-packed
machines, and lots of disks. AKA, modern expensive, top of the
line stuff. It seems to me that developers just don't have that
stuff lying around (hence their asking for it.) If these machines
were avaliable, distcc would see a lot of diminishing returns.
However, without the hardware for f2k7, ...
| Feb 27, 12:29 pm 2007 |
| Andreas Bihlmaier | Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kernel b ...
Hello misc@,
[sorry this got much longer than I wanted it to]
I'm pretty sure many other people have already thought about, or even
used this, for faster compilation of kernels:
distcc
I wanted to wait with this message until I have everything together
concerning patches for distcc integration to bsd.port.mk and possibly
other parts of the tree. But since I read about the upcoming hackathon
and call for fast machines (I know they are still needed) I'm sending
this now. This gives people ...
| Feb 27, 9:53 am 2007 |
| Wade, Daniel | Re: Unsupported USB -> Serial Adapter
I just noticed that myself.
dmesg with device unplugged. I can get a dmesg with the device plugged
in at boot later tonight.
OpenBSD 4.1-beta (GENERIC.MP.acpi) #0: Thu Feb 22 12:27:00 MST 2007
root@laptop.ntelos.net:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP.acpi
real mem = 2137128960 (2087040K)
avail mem = 1826136064 (1783336K)
using 22937 buffers containing 213921792 bytes (208908K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf6e60 (62 entries)
bios0: Dell ...
| Feb 27, 9:16 am 2007 |
| Marius Hooge | low sound quality (OpenBSD 4.0)
Last year, I switched to OpenBSD 4.0 (from FreeBSD) and noticed a
decrease of
the *heard* sound quality when playing the same files. It sounds like a
lower
bit rate (imagine a 96 kbit/s mp3 at higher volumes for example), but I
can't
pinpoint it, though.
My friends told me to fiddle with mixerctl inputs.dac, but I couldn't get it
any better.
My sound device is:
ac97: codec id 0x414c4720 (Avance Logic ALC650)
ac97: codec features 20 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, Realtek 3D
audio0 at auvia0
See my ...
| Feb 27, 9:09 am 2007 |
| Darrin Chandler | Re: Unsupported USB -> Serial Adapter
Looks like it's already there. From /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs:
/* Palm Computing, Inc. product */
product PALM SERIAL 0x0080 USB Serial Adaptor
That's from a 4.0-stable source tree. Can you supply a dmesg?
--
Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group
dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/
http://www.stilyagin.com/darrin/ |
| Feb 27, 8:50 am 2007 |
| Wade, Daniel | Unsupported USB -> Serial Adapter
Any chance this is supported by one of the existing driver, but just
needs the ID to be added?
port 2 addr 2: full speed, power 94 mA, config 1, USB Serial
Adaptor(0x0080), Palm Computing, Inc.(0x0830), rev 1.00
| Feb 27, 7:30 am 2007 |
| Stuart Henderson | Re: Unsupported USB -> Serial Adapter
It's in usbdevs but not attached to a driver.
Looks like Linux attaches this to their equivalent to uvisor;
you could try
Index: dev/usb/uvisor.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/uvisor.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -p -r1.27 uvisor.c
--- dev/usb/uvisor.c 23 Jun 2006 06:27:12 -0000 1.27
+++ dev/usb/uvisor.c 27 Feb 2007 16:07:06 -0000
@@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static const struct uvisor_type uvisor_d
{{ USB_VENDOR_PALM, ...
| Feb 27, 9:08 am 2007 |
| Frans Haarman | pf log question
# tcpdump -e -ttt -n -i pflog0
tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file), capture size 96 bytes
000000 rule 4294967295/unkn(8): pass in on bge0: 172.16.10.89 >
224.0.0.22: igmp v3 report, 1 group record(s)
001063 rule 4294967295/unkn(8): pass in on bge0: 172.16.10.89 >
224.0.0.22: igmp v3 report, 1 group record(s)
875640 rule 4294967295/unkn(8): pass in on ...
| Feb 27, 6:34 am 2007 |
| Gustavo Rios | Re: pf log question
Could you send your pf.conf entirely?
| Feb 27, 7:47 am 2007 |
| Frans Haarman | Re: pf log question
rdr-anchor bge0-rdr
nat-anchor bge0-nat
#rdr on bge0 from any to 10.110.1.1 tag tun0 -> 192.168.1.1
#nat on tun0 inet from any to 192.168.1.1 -> tun0
#pass in log on bge0 route-to tun0 tagged tun0 keep state
anchor bge0-rules
This happend when playing with anchors. It seems to me the anchors did
not get flushed when I restarted PF! I am now thinking an old anchor
rule was responisble for this behaviour.
I do not understand however how this whole anchor stuff works,
investigating a ...
| Feb 27, 8:59 am 2007 |
| sof bo | USB debug
Hi,
I've got now a openBSD kernel with USB
I would like to see all debug
(printf in code)
I compile with option USB_debug but i have not get more
message
what have I to do?
thanks
___________________________________________________________________________
Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions !
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des internautes
sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
| Feb 27, 6:26 am 2007 |
| Joachim Schipper | Re: USB debug
Quite a few parts of the kernel seem to follow the pattern of, for
instance, src/sys/dev/usb/umass.c:
#ifdef UMASS_DEBUG
int umassdebug = 0;
/* ... */
#endif
Unless I am mistaken, you'd have to use ddb to set umassdebug after
compiling with UMASS_DEBUG (which may or may not be set if USB_DEBUG is
set).
Joachim
| Feb 27, 3:47 pm 2007 |
| Stuart Henderson | Re: Dummy Interface In OpenBGPd
fwiw, one piece of fallout from listing the same address on a loopback
interface as a real iface is that ntpd 'listen on *' tries to listen to
the same address twice and fails, so you need to list the addresses
individually in ntpd.conf.
(other than that, I haven't seen any major problems, but I'd put it in
the category of "if you do this you'd better be ready to work out what's
breaking and how to fix it" and my third question definitely still
stands :)
| Feb 27, 5:40 am 2007 |
| Miod Vallat | Re: pbm with latest macppc snap
My fault. This will be fixed in the next snapshot.
Miod
| Feb 27, 6:14 am 2007 |
| Antoine Jacoutot | pbm with latest macppc snap
Hi.
Does anyone have a problem with the latest macppc snapshot?
Booting the cd41.iso, it loops with:
"init: single user shell terminated, restarting"
If you upgrade by extracting the sets, when restarting, you get:
"init: /bin/dh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single user mode"
"Enter pathname of shell or RETURN for sh:"
"init: single user shell terminated, restarting"
"Enter pathname of shell or RETURN for sh:"
"init: single user shell terminated, restarting"
...
-- ...
| Feb 27, 5:34 am 2007 |
| OpenBSD - Wire Consu ... | Re: pbm with latest macppc snap
Hi.
I do. I just tried to update my macppc to latest snapshot
and start getting this messages.
Pedro
| Feb 27, 5:41 am 2007 |
| Daniel Ouellet | Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
Because in both cases the full packet content, header and all need/would
be move between the network card vlan 2 to memory then back to the same
card vlan 3 for example, oppose to card 1 to memory, then card 2?
So, it might only make a difference then on big packets that would need
to cross over a PCI bridge then? Or not even then?
I am really trying to find ways to increase the pps limitations.
| Feb 27, 1:27 am 2007 |
| Daniel Ouellet | Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
For the card, I sure know, but it's stat to be pretty darn expensive to
test what's on the market and new one as well. I fell sometime it would
be less expensive to have a custom one design using FPGA or something!
As for hacking, I started, but not on that yet anyway.
Thanks for your feedback.
And if that wasn't asking to much, it would be very interesting to know
what tweak you do to increase the limits some.
One way or an other, will find a way to increase more.
Daniel.
| Feb 27, 2:10 am 2007 |
| Henning Brauer | Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
not really.
--
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
| Feb 27, 1:06 am 2007 |
| Daniel Ouellet | Routing differences between physical network cards VS VL ...
I am trying to understand or see if there would be differences between
using OpenBSD for routing in a setup where the routing is done between
two VLan's for example oppose to between to physical network cards.
Any impact on the pps capability between the two?
Internally to the server/router, is the processor actually look at all
the packets content, or just the headers and the rest is done via DMA,
or what else?
I would to find more informations as to what part play what in routing
in ...
| Feb 27, 12:57 am 2007 |
| Henning Brauer | Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
use better network cards, or start hacking :)
--
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
| Feb 27, 1:46 am 2007 |
| Daniel Ouellet | Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
I didn't expect that to be easy or fix in a snap, or having anyone
working on it. I really wanted to know the path and logic of it for my
own knowledge and understanding.
On a side note however, would a mini sponsor hacketon specific to this
subject be of any interest to anyone? Just asking, no flame please.
Thanks again.
Daniel
| Feb 27, 2:36 pm 2007 |
| Claudio Jeker | Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
Hah. Developing an ueberfast FPGA network card needs at least a manyear of
work and that's a very optimistic prognosis. I guess buying two three
motherbords and a bunch of GigE cards (two or three cards for em, bge,
There is no mystical knob to push and the network stack enables the
afterburner. Sure there is net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen that needs to be bumped
up on high speed routers (check against net.inet.ip.ifq.drops to find the
sweet spot) but that's about it.
The normal routing path is ...
| Feb 27, 4:53 am 2007 |
| Daniel Ouellet | Re: Wireless Access Points and DHCPd
Is you D-Link wireless access point offer DHCP proxy or DHCP relay
agent? If not, (and I don't think lower model would offer that) how do
you expect your OpenBSD box to get and answer the DHCP broadcast request
from the wireless client? Look for either proxy or relay agent on your
wireless to allow what you want to do.
| Feb 26, 11:15 pm 2007 |
| Greg Thomas | Re: Wireless Access Points and DHCPd
How's your subnetting? Are the APs doing any routing? If so they're
going to need to be doing some dhcp relaying.
Greg
| Feb 26, 11:11 pm 2007 |
| Shohrukh Shoyokubov | Wireless Access Points and DHCPd
Hello,
I have problem with assigning IP addresses to wireless clients using
DHCP. I have two D-Link DWL-G700AP access points and turned their DHCP
servers off. They are connected to my wired network, where my OpenBSD
server resides. I have configured OpenBSD as DHCP server and it works
fine with wired clients, but no success with wireless clients. Am I
missing something?
Thanks
| Feb 26, 10:51 pm 2007 |
| Darren Spruell | Re: Wireless Access Points and DHCPd
How do we know if you're not explaining your configuration and showing
the setup?
DS
| Feb 26, 11:25 pm 2007 |
| scorch | Re: binary updates
you *can* do this - use snapshots. i just did one today -
check openbsd.org/ for any upgrade information
- download bsd.rd, reboot on that & follow (u)pgrade instructions
- it uses ftp to retrieve the rest of the sets you need
- use pkg_add -uiv to upgrade any packages for the final finishing touches
looks like a binary upgrade to me. or are you expecting something else?
a+
scorch
| Feb 27, 1:23 am 2007 |
| Default User | binary updates
When will we ever see binary updates for OpenBSD? Taking a system
off-line for over 20 hours to do a source code rebuild is just too long,
and just tracking RELEASE means running an insecure system.
Binary updating - try it, you'll like it!
| Feb 26, 9:31 pm 2007 |
| Joachim Schipper | Re: binary updates
There are no binary updates for the base system to the -stable branch.
The solution, of course, is to create those yourself - see release(8),
the FAQ, or ...
And hint: system don't need to be taken offline in most cases, and you
*can* build on a non-production machine.
Joachim
| Feb 27, 4:06 am 2007 |
| bofh | Re: binary updates
Just curious - why are you using a system that you don't understand
the philosophy of? No, that came out wrong. Why aren't you trying to
better understand the system you are using?
| Feb 27, 12:09 am 2007 |
| Marc Espie | Re: binary updates
The main reason we don't have binary stable updates is that no-one we
trust has the time to build them. It means maintaining an extra machine
that would only track stable, do builds, do the equivalent of releases.
One release every six months is a lot of work already.
If people want to provide stable builds, they're free to do so. Of course,
there's a catch: you have to trust external people to give you trojan-free
stuff...
| Feb 27, 4:44 am 2007 |
| RW | Re: binary updates
Troll >/dev/null
Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?
| Feb 26, 10:54 pm 2007 |
| Darren Spruell | Re: kadmin problem
What style of kerberos authentication are you attempting? Do you want
to make the password you use to authenticate with the one that you use
to get your TGT issued, or do you want to use GSSAPI authentication
to perform full-on ticket-based credentialing? Both are possible.
At any rate, your above error "Server not found in Kerberos database"
suggests that you've sent a request to get a ticket for your server
and that server doesn't yet exist in the kerberos database. The
principal for the ...
| Feb 27, 8:05 am 2007 |
| Bob Beck | Re: kadmin problem
You don't have host principal for your machine added to
Run, don't walk, to your nearest bookstore and buy a kerberos
book, and see ktutil(8).
For login type services in kerberos you should add a host
principal on your kerberos server, and save the key on your machine
in your krb5.keytab. SSH enforces this. This is to ensure you
aren't talking to a fake kdc, otherwise, someone could pretend to
be your kdc and you'd be hooped.
Note you need to have admin access to do a ktuil add. ...
| Feb 27, 8:42 am 2007 |
| RJ45 | Re: kadmin problem
actually i just need ssh kerberos authentication
but the problem is that using ssh kerberos authentication I got an error
upon autghentication
Feb 26 21:42:54 bastionbox1 krb5: verify: Server not found in Kerberos
database
I configured sshd_config properly and i also changed setting to login.conf
so that user are authenticated with krb5
but I ahve this error and I am unable to authenticate using sshd as I
wanted to do.
but if I just enter the system with local password and the after I ...
| Feb 27, 2:37 am 2007 |
| Samuel Moñux | Re: Source Interface for outgoing connections
No it isn't. Looking at the source does not seem hard to do, however.
Maybe I'll make an small patch to address this. It's not an uncommon
situation to sit a public addressable range in a DMZ, and use a
Yes, I have tried with different natt modes. But connection dies
2h50min after. I'm not sure if the problem is natt related, it's just
I had done that. Thanks for your comments, Darren
| Feb 27, 12:12 am 2007 |
| Anselm R. Garbe | Re: OpenBSD 4.0 / Xorg -> vesa 1920x1200 widescreen resolution
I debugged further with a recent OpenBSD 4.1 snapshot and can
claim the following:
- plain Xorg vesa drivers don't support widescreen formats
(16:9 and 16:10 formats are discussed to be supported _maybe_
in future VESA specs - so people who claim that
Xorg's vesa driver works with a 1920x1200 resolution simply
can't read the output of xdpyinfo or Xorg.N.log)
- FireGL 5200 is a rv530 (x1600) chip derivative. Those chips
are not supported by the ati/radeon Xorg drivers - and ATI
...
| Feb 27, 3:35 am 2007 |
| Stefan Kell | Re: keyboard lockup, KVM, dual-boot
Hi,
good idea, I used snapshot from Feb 25th. This works very well.
Regards
Stefan Kell
| Feb 27, 11:27 am 2007 |
| Stefan Kell | Re: keyboard lockup, KVM, dual-boot
Hello Nick,
I got it reproducible: using UKC does not make any problems but using
boot-option -a for selecting the root-device locks the keyboard. Maybe
there is a clash between wscons and the kernel reading the keyboard?
I tried the snapshot dating Feb 25th and this works well. There is also
no problem with the mouse in X-windows, which is not usable in 4.0.
Dmesg follows.
Regards
Stefan Kell
OpenBSD 4.1-beta (GENERIC) #1409: Sun Feb 25 14:07:16 MST 2007
...
| Feb 27, 11:32 am 2007 |
| Olaf Schreck | Re: Route-based VPN Interop
Yes you can. Multicast over gre(4) works since 4.0 IIRC.
ciao,
chakl
| Feb 27, 2:16 am 2007 |
| Olaf Schreck | Re: monitoring traffic/bandwidth on a bridge
A bridge *interface* can have an IP address, though that's not a common
configuration. Try assigning an address to one of the bridge interfaces
and point ntop to that interface instead of bridge0.
ciao,
chakl
| Feb 27, 2:06 am 2007 |
| Lars Hansson | Re: monitoring traffic/bandwidth on a bridge
netflow using pfflowd does the trick but it might be a bit daunting to
set up.
---
Lars Hansson
| Feb 26, 7:16 pm 2007 |
| Stuart Henderson | Re: monitoring traffic/bandwidth on a bridge
to clarify - an interface which is a member of a bridge can have an
bpf looks at packets to/from the nic, not the whole bridge.
You need to run two instances, one pointed at each interface,
to see all the traffic. And with this problem with ntop,
(It's not uncommon either; one scenario is when you have a small
subnet from an ISP, want to place a packet filter between the router
and the LAN, don't want to burn most IP addresses, and want the
filter to be manageable in-band.)
| Feb 27, 4:38 am 2007 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| February 26, 2007 | February 27, 2007 | February 28, 2007 |
