openbsd-misc mailing list

FromSubjectsort iconDate
Damien Miller
Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
also, does it work if you try connecting without any keys in your ssh-agent? ...
Feb 27, 4:42 pm 2007
Damien Miller
Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
Please send a Debug3 trace (sshd -dddp222), debug level 1 doesn't contain all the necessary information -d
Feb 27, 4:20 pm 2007
Damien Miller
Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
what does the client say? (ssh -vvvp 222 localhost)
Feb 27, 4:41 pm 2007
Josh Grosse
Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
Oops, forgot to add my dmesg. This kernel is GENERIC+RAIDFrame: OpenBSD 4.1-beta (JGGIMI) #14: Sun Feb 25 13:36:43 EST 2007 josh@jggimi.homeip.net:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/JGGIMI cpu0: AMD Sempron(tm) 2600+ ("AuthenticAMD" 686-class, 256KB L2 cache) 1.84 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE real mem = 502820864 (491036K) avail mem = 450584576 (440024K) using 4278 buffers containing 25264128 bytes (24672K) of memory mainbus0 ...
Feb 27, 3:41 pm 2007
Josh Grosse
ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped workin ...
After building -current on Feb 25, I noticed when I attempted to use S/Key remotely, that it was not a permitted authentication style. (I use S/Key when publc key authentication is not available, so it may have nothing to do with recent changes to how sshd_config Match works, and may be something else entirely, I have not used S/Key in a few weeks.) Trying to recreate the problem, I ran sshd in debug mode, and ssh -vvv; it looks like the authentication method isn't viable. I'm hoping ...
Feb 27, 3:38 pm 2007
Josh Grosse
Re: ssh/sshd challenge-response seems to have stopped wo ...
debug2: load_server_config: filename /etc/ssh/sshd_config debug2: load_server_config: done config len = 268 debug2: parse_server_config: config /etc/ssh/sshd_config len 268 debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:12 setting PermitRootLogin no debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:13 setting PasswordAuthentication no debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:14 setting ClientAliveInterval 15 debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:15 setting ClientAliveCountMax 3 debug3: /etc/ssh/sshd_config:16 setting X11Forwarding yes debug3: ...
Feb 27, 4:33 pm 2007
Alejandro Lozanoff
HP Prolliant DL320 G4 -SAS- Supported?
Hi list, I was wondering if anyone has tried this machine succesfully? The SmarArray P800 is supported on 4.0 (and the P400 and e200 seems to have been added to 4.1), altough ciss(4) doesnt mention SAS on the 4.0 version, only SATA. Is it the same? The nic exact model isnt listed on bge(4) but it might just work. I dont know about the rest of the stuff, chipsets, motherboard, sensors, etc. If it doesnt work it'll be the same as paperweight, so i want to be sure before buying. Thanks in ...
Feb 27, 3:05 pm 2007
Gustavo Rios Feb 27, 3:10 pm 2007
Berk D. Demir
Re: spamd-white
You won't be playing with spamd-white table except for testing. You should declare your whitelist to spamd.conf white:\ :white:\ :method=file:\ spamd exactly executes the command pfctl -p /dev/pf -q -t spamd-white -T replace -f - As stated above, please use spamd.conf man 5 spamd.conf will help much.
Feb 27, 3:24 pm 2007
RW
Re: spamd-white
Try looking at /etc/spamd.conf (the default copy from install) Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?
Feb 27, 3:20 pm 2007
Tom Bombadil
spamd-white
Greetings... By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I add manually to spamd-white? spamd(8) says: "spamd regularly scans the /var/db/spamd database and configures all whitelist addresses as the spamd-white pf(4) table." How exactly does spamd configure spamd-white table? The objective is to safely add my own IPs to the whitelist. Thanks :)
Feb 27, 2:55 pm 2007
Gordon Ross
Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
Buy a CD set http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html ;-) I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on Gentoo Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD as guest even though their website states that it is possible. My main question is how to create an OBSD image since it seems that I need an ISO image.
Feb 27, 1:31 pm 2007
Paul Pruett
Re: same version upgrade i386 to amd64 gotchas?
I have received several assurances that -current may have resolved some weirds for i386 on amd64 processors... With hesitation I could try jumping to current instead of stable amd64. I have used -current on productin before, but only after verifying the ports could make w/o fubars Either amd64 stable or i386 current I'll still should remake the ports to match, especially openldap and cyrus-imapd and verify. :(
Feb 27, 1:14 pm 2007
Wade, Daniel Feb 27, 12:46 pm 2007
Darren Spruell
Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
You can't boot off of your CDROM? As for images, you can installer images in CDROM format and floppy format off of the FTP mirrors. -- Darren Spruell phatbuckett@gmail.com
Feb 27, 12:34 pm 2007
Marco Peereboom
Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
What is wrong with the iso that is on the ftp sites? Can't you finish the install over the network?
Feb 27, 12:35 pm 2007
Darren Spruell
Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
Bear in mind that this project may not be able to successfully load OpenBSD yet. DS
Feb 27, 4:27 pm 2007
Andreas Maus
Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
You can fetch a installation iso (cd40.iso) from a mirror and install via network. Or support OpenBSD and buy the CD sets ^^ Andreas. -- Hobbes : Shouldn't we read the instructions? Calvin : Do I look like a sissy?
Feb 27, 12:35 pm 2007
Peter
OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on Gentoo Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD as guest even though their website states that it is possible. My main question is how to create an OBSD image since it seems that I need an ISO image. PM
Feb 27, 12:17 pm 2007
Peter
Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
Are you talking about the "install ISO's" like cdrom.iso or floppy.iso? If so, yes, I can use them. I thought I needed a full-blown release ISO. I am also stuck at launching the virtualbox interface itself. I get either a segmentation fault if started using a non-priv user or an 'authentication rejected' error if I 'su -c virtualbox'. I have tried the usual trick of 'xhost +' as the non-priv user and then su to root and 'virtualbox' but I get the 'cannot connect to X server' stuff. Any ...
Feb 27, 1:25 pm 2007
Vijay Sankar
Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
dd if=/dev/cdrom of=openbsd40.iso OR cat /dev/cdrom > openbsd40.iso (assuming you have the OpenBSD CD in the CDROM drive) -- Vijay Sankar ForeTell Technologies Limited 59 Flamingo Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3J 0X6 Phone: +1 (204) 885-9535, E-Mail: vsankar@foretell.ca
Feb 27, 3:37 pm 2007
Tobias Weisserth
Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
Hi there, You can buy the OpenBSD CDs here: http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html You can also try to do a FTP installation inside your virtual box, it should have access to the Internet if you configured your host box correctly. There's a tiny ISO on the FTP servers that allows you to boot into the installation program. Another option is to create a full ISO image yourself. Just use Google to lookup the details. It's not difficult at all. regards, Tobias W.
Feb 27, 1:02 pm 2007
Albert Chin
Re: Help with 4.0 pf queueing
I only added "red" to the http queue because it was in the http queues in the pf FAQ :) Ok, thanks. I'm now running ftp-proxy with: # /usr/sbin/ftp-proxy -R 192.168.10.1 -p 8022 -q queue_ftp and I changed the queue rules to: altq on fxp4 cbq bandwidth 1.5Mb queue \ { queue_std, queue_ftp, queue_http } queue queue_std bandwidth 80% priority 7 cbq(default borrow) queue queue_ftp bandwidth 10% priority 0 cbq(borrow) queue queue_http bandwidth 10% priority 3 cbq(borrow) ...
Feb 27, 2:32 pm 2007
Tim Kuhlman
Re: Help with 4.0 pf queueing
You are queueing on fxp1 on the external firewall. This should affect traffic going from the external firewall to the www/ftp server, however it sounds like you are trying to affect traffice moving the opposite direction. To quote from the pf faq, "Note that queueing is only useful for packets in the outbound direction. Once a packet arrives on an interface in the inbound direction it's already too late to queue it -- it's already consumed network bandwidth to get to the interface that ...
Feb 27, 12:40 pm 2007
Albert Chin
Help with 4.0 pf queueing
I have the following setup: | | (67.95.100.16 - fxp4) | (67.95.100.17 - fxp4) ---------------- | EXTERNAL | | FIREWALL | ---------------- | (192.168.10.2 - fxp1) (192.168.10.1) | ---------------- | ...
Feb 27, 11:31 am 2007
Stuart Henderson
Re: Help with 4.0 pf queueing
You're queueing on the wrong interface to restrict outgoing traffic. This is throttling _incoming_ traffic e.g. in your example it's throttling requests and mainly ACKs; due to RED dropping these ACKs you're probably triggering TCP congestion-avoidance. You can assign traffic to queues based on _state created by rules on fxp1_ (the state table entry includes the name of the queue to place the associated packets in). But the actual queues are for _outgoing_ traffic so they need to be on the ...
Feb 27, 12:57 pm 2007
Albert Chin Feb 27, 1:55 pm 2007
Gareth
kernel source question
This question may be more appropriate for tech@ but i thought i'd try here first just in case. lets say i have a bunch of #defines, for example (from sys/dev/wscons/wsconsio.h): /* Event type definitions. Comment for each is information in value. */ #define WSCONS_EVENT_KEY_UP 1 /* key code */ #define WSCONS_EVENT_KEY_DOWN 2 /* key code */ #define WSCONS_EVENT_ALL_KEYS_UP 3 /* void */ #define WSCONS_EVENT_MOUSE_UP 4 /* button # ...
Feb 27, 11:23 am 2007
Nick !
Re: kernel source question
Oh no, never do that. You would then be using different flags than code that is already compiled (using the original definitions). If you change this and then recompile *everything* you're safe, but only so long as you do that. It's not compatible outside of your world, so This is the usual route taken, however why are you doing this? Mucking with kernel #defines is sort of priviliged, because everyone has to be kept in sync on them. -Nick
Feb 27, 12:32 pm 2007
Stuart Henderson
Re: same version upgrade i386 to amd64 gotchas?
It's not very fun. As well as ports, you have to take care of the boot loader; install an amd64 bsd.rd and boot loader from i386; reboot into the new bsd.rd and you can do an upgrade install from *.tgz. Not really recommended unless there's no alternative.
Feb 27, 10:45 am 2007
Paul Pruett
same version upgrade i386 to amd64 gotchas?
After consideration and due to weird problems afore discussed, I will likely be upgrading an openbsd 4.0 i386 server to an openbsd 4.0 amd64. Yes in retrospect I should have used the amd64 build not the i386 build on an athlon64 cpu... But I now have a 'production ' cyrus-imapd/sendmail server that even after make builds, changing motherboard, cpu, & memory still has a random lockup w/ no kernel fault displayed about once a week, ... and for that and I would prefer to have amd64 go ...
Feb 27, 10:03 am 2007
Andreas Bihlmaier
Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
Well, April, not March, doh! Okay so there will be some more time to make this work :) But to quote from undeadly.org: ... fast build machines will help compiling kernels, as most of the work takes place in the kernel and we will compile a lot of them .. It was just targeted at THIS particular issue and the future ideas to continue making OpenBSD (development) better/more fun. Regards, ahb
Feb 27, 10:57 am 2007
Bob Beck
Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
And by detracting from the important issue which is: * We need gear in europe for f2k7 * You manage to sidetrack something important with your hack. So in doing so you do us a disservice rather than helping. your hack is useless without gear to run it on. So please just shut up and go away for a while, and bring this up at an appropriate time. distributed kernel building does *NOT* help this issue. -Bob
Feb 27, 11:43 am 2007
Andreas Bihlmaier
Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
Unfortunately I have nothing financial to help out, but I see this was the wrong time and wrong place. SORRY I don't know if a lot of big corps (meaning the "decision making part") is reading misc@, but if they do: IF YOU (big corp, small corp, rich guy) ARE USING OPENBSD AND YOU ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ITS GREAT POSSIBILITIES, LOAN/DONATE BIG HARDWARE TO GIVE THE DEVS AT LEAST A LITTLE HAND FOR WHAT THEY GIVE TO YOU! Btw. they SHOULD know already, this was said many times over and ...
Feb 27, 1:21 pm 2007
Martin Reindl
Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
f2k7 is not in 2 weeks but from 10th to 15th April and this still does not help with DISKSPACE and SERVERS to plug them in.
Feb 27, 10:48 am 2007
Travers Buda
Re: Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kern ...
Jeez, I sense some hostility on misc@. Andreas, It's a nice effort, but unfortunately, it won't support the goals of f2k7. The most important lacking thing for the hackathon is fast, memory-packed machines, and lots of disks. AKA, modern expensive, top of the line stuff. It seems to me that developers just don't have that stuff lying around (hence their asking for it.) If these machines were avaliable, distcc would see a lot of diminishing returns. However, without the hardware for f2k7, ...
Feb 27, 12:29 pm 2007
Andreas Bihlmaier
Concerning Filesystem Mini-Hackathon and faster kernel b ...
Hello misc@, [sorry this got much longer than I wanted it to] I'm pretty sure many other people have already thought about, or even used this, for faster compilation of kernels: distcc I wanted to wait with this message until I have everything together concerning patches for distcc integration to bsd.port.mk and possibly other parts of the tree. But since I read about the upcoming hackathon and call for fast machines (I know they are still needed) I'm sending this now. This gives people ...
Feb 27, 9:53 am 2007
Wade, Daniel
Re: Unsupported USB -> Serial Adapter
I just noticed that myself. dmesg with device unplugged. I can get a dmesg with the device plugged in at boot later tonight. OpenBSD 4.1-beta (GENERIC.MP.acpi) #0: Thu Feb 22 12:27:00 MST 2007 root@laptop.ntelos.net:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP.acpi real mem = 2137128960 (2087040K) avail mem = 1826136064 (1783336K) using 22937 buffers containing 213921792 bytes (208908K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf6e60 (62 entries) bios0: Dell ...
Feb 27, 9:16 am 2007
Marius Hooge
low sound quality (OpenBSD 4.0)
Last year, I switched to OpenBSD 4.0 (from FreeBSD) and noticed a decrease of the *heard* sound quality when playing the same files. It sounds like a lower bit rate (imagine a 96 kbit/s mp3 at higher volumes for example), but I can't pinpoint it, though. My friends told me to fiddle with mixerctl inputs.dac, but I couldn't get it any better. My sound device is: ac97: codec id 0x414c4720 (Avance Logic ALC650) ac97: codec features 20 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, Realtek 3D audio0 at auvia0 See my ...
Feb 27, 9:09 am 2007
Darrin Chandler
Re: Unsupported USB -> Serial Adapter
Looks like it's already there. From /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs: /* Palm Computing, Inc. product */ product PALM SERIAL 0x0080 USB Serial Adaptor That's from a 4.0-stable source tree. Can you supply a dmesg? -- Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ http://www.stilyagin.com/darrin/ |
Feb 27, 8:50 am 2007
Wade, Daniel
Unsupported USB -> Serial Adapter
Any chance this is supported by one of the existing driver, but just needs the ID to be added? port 2 addr 2: full speed, power 94 mA, config 1, USB Serial Adaptor(0x0080), Palm Computing, Inc.(0x0830), rev 1.00
Feb 27, 7:30 am 2007
Stuart Henderson
Re: Unsupported USB -> Serial Adapter
It's in usbdevs but not attached to a driver. Looks like Linux attaches this to their equivalent to uvisor; you could try Index: dev/usb/uvisor.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/uvisor.c,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -p -r1.27 uvisor.c --- dev/usb/uvisor.c 23 Jun 2006 06:27:12 -0000 1.27 +++ dev/usb/uvisor.c 27 Feb 2007 16:07:06 -0000 @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static const struct uvisor_type uvisor_d {{ USB_VENDOR_PALM, ...
Feb 27, 9:08 am 2007
Frans Haarman
pf log question
# tcpdump -e -ttt -n -i pflog0 tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file), capture size 96 bytes 000000 rule 4294967295/unkn(8): pass in on bge0: 172.16.10.89 > 224.0.0.22: igmp v3 report, 1 group record(s) 001063 rule 4294967295/unkn(8): pass in on bge0: 172.16.10.89 > 224.0.0.22: igmp v3 report, 1 group record(s) 875640 rule 4294967295/unkn(8): pass in on ...
Feb 27, 6:34 am 2007
Gustavo Rios
Re: pf log question
Could you send your pf.conf entirely?
Feb 27, 7:47 am 2007
Frans Haarman
Re: pf log question
rdr-anchor bge0-rdr nat-anchor bge0-nat #rdr on bge0 from any to 10.110.1.1 tag tun0 -> 192.168.1.1 #nat on tun0 inet from any to 192.168.1.1 -> tun0 #pass in log on bge0 route-to tun0 tagged tun0 keep state anchor bge0-rules This happend when playing with anchors. It seems to me the anchors did not get flushed when I restarted PF! I am now thinking an old anchor rule was responisble for this behaviour. I do not understand however how this whole anchor stuff works, investigating a ...
Feb 27, 8:59 am 2007
sof bo
USB debug
Hi, I've got now a openBSD kernel with USB I would like to see all debug (printf in code) I compile with option USB_debug but i have not get more message what have I to do? thanks ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Feb 27, 6:26 am 2007
Joachim Schipper
Re: USB debug
Quite a few parts of the kernel seem to follow the pattern of, for instance, src/sys/dev/usb/umass.c: #ifdef UMASS_DEBUG int umassdebug = 0; /* ... */ #endif Unless I am mistaken, you'd have to use ddb to set umassdebug after compiling with UMASS_DEBUG (which may or may not be set if USB_DEBUG is set). Joachim
Feb 27, 3:47 pm 2007
Stuart Henderson
Re: Dummy Interface In OpenBGPd
fwiw, one piece of fallout from listing the same address on a loopback interface as a real iface is that ntpd 'listen on *' tries to listen to the same address twice and fails, so you need to list the addresses individually in ntpd.conf. (other than that, I haven't seen any major problems, but I'd put it in the category of "if you do this you'd better be ready to work out what's breaking and how to fix it" and my third question definitely still stands :)
Feb 27, 5:40 am 2007
Miod Vallat
Re: pbm with latest macppc snap
My fault. This will be fixed in the next snapshot. Miod
Feb 27, 6:14 am 2007
Antoine Jacoutot
pbm with latest macppc snap
Hi. Does anyone have a problem with the latest macppc snapshot? Booting the cd41.iso, it loops with: "init: single user shell terminated, restarting" If you upgrade by extracting the sets, when restarting, you get: "init: /bin/dh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single user mode" "Enter pathname of shell or RETURN for sh:" "init: single user shell terminated, restarting" "Enter pathname of shell or RETURN for sh:" "init: single user shell terminated, restarting" ... -- ...
Feb 27, 5:34 am 2007
OpenBSD - Wire Consu ...
Re: pbm with latest macppc snap
Hi. I do. I just tried to update my macppc to latest snapshot and start getting this messages. Pedro
Feb 27, 5:41 am 2007
Daniel Ouellet
Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
Because in both cases the full packet content, header and all need/would be move between the network card vlan 2 to memory then back to the same card vlan 3 for example, oppose to card 1 to memory, then card 2? So, it might only make a difference then on big packets that would need to cross over a PCI bridge then? Or not even then? I am really trying to find ways to increase the pps limitations.
Feb 27, 1:27 am 2007
Daniel Ouellet
Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
For the card, I sure know, but it's stat to be pretty darn expensive to test what's on the market and new one as well. I fell sometime it would be less expensive to have a custom one design using FPGA or something! As for hacking, I started, but not on that yet anyway. Thanks for your feedback. And if that wasn't asking to much, it would be very interesting to know what tweak you do to increase the limits some. One way or an other, will find a way to increase more. Daniel.
Feb 27, 2:10 am 2007
Henning Brauer
Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
not really. -- Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
Feb 27, 1:06 am 2007
Daniel Ouellet
Routing differences between physical network cards VS VL ...
I am trying to understand or see if there would be differences between using OpenBSD for routing in a setup where the routing is done between two VLan's for example oppose to between to physical network cards. Any impact on the pps capability between the two? Internally to the server/router, is the processor actually look at all the packets content, or just the headers and the rest is done via DMA, or what else? I would to find more informations as to what part play what in routing in ...
Feb 27, 12:57 am 2007
Henning Brauer
Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
use better network cards, or start hacking :) -- Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
Feb 27, 1:46 am 2007
Daniel Ouellet
Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
I didn't expect that to be easy or fix in a snap, or having anyone working on it. I really wanted to know the path and logic of it for my own knowledge and understanding. On a side note however, would a mini sponsor hacketon specific to this subject be of any interest to anyone? Just asking, no flame please. Thanks again. Daniel
Feb 27, 2:36 pm 2007
Claudio Jeker
Re: Routing differences between physical network cards V ...
Hah. Developing an ueberfast FPGA network card needs at least a manyear of work and that's a very optimistic prognosis. I guess buying two three motherbords and a bunch of GigE cards (two or three cards for em, bge, There is no mystical knob to push and the network stack enables the afterburner. Sure there is net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen that needs to be bumped up on high speed routers (check against net.inet.ip.ifq.drops to find the sweet spot) but that's about it. The normal routing path is ...
Feb 27, 4:53 am 2007
Daniel Ouellet
Re: Wireless Access Points and DHCPd
Is you D-Link wireless access point offer DHCP proxy or DHCP relay agent? If not, (and I don't think lower model would offer that) how do you expect your OpenBSD box to get and answer the DHCP broadcast request from the wireless client? Look for either proxy or relay agent on your wireless to allow what you want to do.
Feb 26, 11:15 pm 2007
Greg Thomas
Re: Wireless Access Points and DHCPd
How's your subnetting? Are the APs doing any routing? If so they're going to need to be doing some dhcp relaying. Greg
Feb 26, 11:11 pm 2007
Shohrukh Shoyokubov
Wireless Access Points and DHCPd
Hello, I have problem with assigning IP addresses to wireless clients using DHCP. I have two D-Link DWL-G700AP access points and turned their DHCP servers off. They are connected to my wired network, where my OpenBSD server resides. I have configured OpenBSD as DHCP server and it works fine with wired clients, but no success with wireless clients. Am I missing something? Thanks
Feb 26, 10:51 pm 2007
Darren Spruell
Re: Wireless Access Points and DHCPd
How do we know if you're not explaining your configuration and showing the setup? DS
Feb 26, 11:25 pm 2007
scorch
Re: binary updates
you *can* do this - use snapshots. i just did one today - check openbsd.org/ for any upgrade information - download bsd.rd, reboot on that & follow (u)pgrade instructions - it uses ftp to retrieve the rest of the sets you need - use pkg_add -uiv to upgrade any packages for the final finishing touches looks like a binary upgrade to me. or are you expecting something else? a+ scorch
Feb 27, 1:23 am 2007
Default User
binary updates
When will we ever see binary updates for OpenBSD? Taking a system off-line for over 20 hours to do a source code rebuild is just too long, and just tracking RELEASE means running an insecure system. Binary updating - try it, you'll like it!
Feb 26, 9:31 pm 2007
Joachim Schipper
Re: binary updates
There are no binary updates for the base system to the -stable branch. The solution, of course, is to create those yourself - see release(8), the FAQ, or ... And hint: system don't need to be taken offline in most cases, and you *can* build on a non-production machine. Joachim
Feb 27, 4:06 am 2007
bofh
Re: binary updates
Just curious - why are you using a system that you don't understand the philosophy of? No, that came out wrong. Why aren't you trying to better understand the system you are using?
Feb 27, 12:09 am 2007
Marc Espie
Re: binary updates
The main reason we don't have binary stable updates is that no-one we trust has the time to build them. It means maintaining an extra machine that would only track stable, do builds, do the equivalent of releases. One release every six months is a lot of work already. If people want to provide stable builds, they're free to do so. Of course, there's a catch: you have to trust external people to give you trojan-free stuff...
Feb 27, 4:44 am 2007
RW
Re: binary updates
Troll >/dev/null Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?
Feb 26, 10:54 pm 2007
Darren Spruell
Re: kadmin problem
What style of kerberos authentication are you attempting? Do you want to make the password you use to authenticate with the one that you use to get your TGT issued, or do you want to use GSSAPI authentication to perform full-on ticket-based credentialing? Both are possible. At any rate, your above error "Server not found in Kerberos database" suggests that you've sent a request to get a ticket for your server and that server doesn't yet exist in the kerberos database. The principal for the ...
Feb 27, 8:05 am 2007
Bob Beck
Re: kadmin problem
You don't have host principal for your machine added to Run, don't walk, to your nearest bookstore and buy a kerberos book, and see ktutil(8). For login type services in kerberos you should add a host principal on your kerberos server, and save the key on your machine in your krb5.keytab. SSH enforces this. This is to ensure you aren't talking to a fake kdc, otherwise, someone could pretend to be your kdc and you'd be hooped. Note you need to have admin access to do a ktuil add. ...
Feb 27, 8:42 am 2007
RJ45
Re: kadmin problem
actually i just need ssh kerberos authentication but the problem is that using ssh kerberos authentication I got an error upon autghentication Feb 26 21:42:54 bastionbox1 krb5: verify: Server not found in Kerberos database I configured sshd_config properly and i also changed setting to login.conf so that user are authenticated with krb5 but I ahve this error and I am unable to authenticate using sshd as I wanted to do. but if I just enter the system with local password and the after I ...
Feb 27, 2:37 am 2007
Samuel Moñux
Re: Source Interface for outgoing connections
No it isn't. Looking at the source does not seem hard to do, however. Maybe I'll make an small patch to address this. It's not an uncommon situation to sit a public addressable range in a DMZ, and use a Yes, I have tried with different natt modes. But connection dies 2h50min after. I'm not sure if the problem is natt related, it's just I had done that. Thanks for your comments, Darren
Feb 27, 12:12 am 2007
Anselm R. Garbe
Re: OpenBSD 4.0 / Xorg -> vesa 1920x1200 widescreen resolution
I debugged further with a recent OpenBSD 4.1 snapshot and can claim the following: - plain Xorg vesa drivers don't support widescreen formats (16:9 and 16:10 formats are discussed to be supported _maybe_ in future VESA specs - so people who claim that Xorg's vesa driver works with a 1920x1200 resolution simply can't read the output of xdpyinfo or Xorg.N.log) - FireGL 5200 is a rv530 (x1600) chip derivative. Those chips are not supported by the ati/radeon Xorg drivers - and ATI ...
Feb 27, 3:35 am 2007
Stefan Kell
Re: keyboard lockup, KVM, dual-boot
Hi, good idea, I used snapshot from Feb 25th. This works very well. Regards Stefan Kell
Feb 27, 11:27 am 2007
Stefan Kell
Re: keyboard lockup, KVM, dual-boot
Hello Nick, I got it reproducible: using UKC does not make any problems but using boot-option -a for selecting the root-device locks the keyboard. Maybe there is a clash between wscons and the kernel reading the keyboard? I tried the snapshot dating Feb 25th and this works well. There is also no problem with the mouse in X-windows, which is not usable in 4.0. Dmesg follows. Regards Stefan Kell OpenBSD 4.1-beta (GENERIC) #1409: Sun Feb 25 14:07:16 MST 2007 ...
Feb 27, 11:32 am 2007
Olaf Schreck
Re: Route-based VPN Interop
Yes you can. Multicast over gre(4) works since 4.0 IIRC. ciao, chakl
Feb 27, 2:16 am 2007
Olaf Schreck
Re: monitoring traffic/bandwidth on a bridge
A bridge *interface* can have an IP address, though that's not a common configuration. Try assigning an address to one of the bridge interfaces and point ntop to that interface instead of bridge0. ciao, chakl
Feb 27, 2:06 am 2007
Lars Hansson
Re: monitoring traffic/bandwidth on a bridge
netflow using pfflowd does the trick but it might be a bit daunting to set up. --- Lars Hansson
Feb 26, 7:16 pm 2007
Stuart Henderson
Re: monitoring traffic/bandwidth on a bridge
to clarify - an interface which is a member of a bridge can have an bpf looks at packets to/from the nic, not the whole bridge. You need to run two instances, one pointed at each interface, to see all the traffic. And with this problem with ntop, (It's not uncommon either; one scenario is when you have a small subnet from an ISP, want to place a packet filter between the router and the LAN, don't want to burn most IP addresses, and want the filter to be manageable in-band.)
Feb 27, 4:38 am 2007
previous daytodaynext day
February 26, 2007February 27, 2007February 28, 2007