Re: SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rob
Date: Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - 10:50 am

Although this doesn't answer your actual pf question, you might try
using a tool called Grok (http://www.semicomplete.com/projects/grok/).
It's a pretty decent log watcher written in Perl, designed to do
exactly this sort of thing. You define matches and reactions in its
config file (match = "Illegal user %USERNAME% from %IP%"; reaction =
"pfctl -t scanners -T add %IP%";).

It does have a few quirks though. We've encountered problems with
having multiple rules watching the same log. But, all in all, probably
a better way to do what it looks like you want to do.

- R.

On 8/8/07, David Newman <dnewman@networktest.com> wrote:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule, Joachim Schipper, (Thu Jun 28, 7:20 am)
Re: SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule, Rob, (Wed Aug 8, 10:50 am)
Re: SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule, Joachim Schipper, (Thu Aug 9, 12:43 pm)
Re: SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule, Stuart Henderson, (Mon Aug 13, 2:10 am)
Re: SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule, Joachim Schipper, (Mon Aug 13, 3:14 am)
Re: SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule, Stuart Henderson, (Mon Aug 13, 4:30 am)