Re: operator permissions: a wish-list

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Matthew Szudzik
Date: Thursday, September 20, 2007 - 9:11 am

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 at 20:41 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

Actually, I was envisioning that the kids would have operator permissions.  
I was thinking that an "operator" is anyone who has physical access to the 
computer and is expected to use the hardware.

I don't know the history of the operator group, but it almost seems as if 
it dates back to the days when BSD ran on mainframes whose only form of 
removable media was a tape drive.  Of course, computers are being used 
much differently nowadays, so it makes sense to update the operator group.

Or, alternatively, maybe the operator group has become obsolete with the 
advent of sudo?  In that case, perhaps the operator group should be 
abolished, because I get the feeling that the operator group, in its 
current form, isn't serving any real purpose.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
operator permissions: a wish-list, Matthew Szudzik, (Wed Sep 19, 2:46 pm)
Re: operator permissions: a wish-list, Stuart Henderson, (Wed Sep 19, 3:12 pm)
Re: operator permissions: a wish-list, Douglas A. Tutty, (Wed Sep 19, 5:41 pm)
Re: operator permissions: a wish-list, Matthew Szudzik, (Thu Sep 20, 9:11 am)
Re: operator permissions: a wish-list, Craig Skinner, (Fri Sep 21, 12:46 am)
Re: operator permissions: a wish-list, Henning Brauer, (Fri Sep 21, 1:31 am)
Re: operator permissions: a wish-list, Craig Skinner, (Fri Sep 21, 1:47 am)