On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 06:16:35PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
The 4 term licence in NetBSD is mostly dead too. It is not pushed as
desirable at all, it is up to the individual developer to use the
licence they feel appropriate and that seems, more often than not, to
be the 3 term licence.
Not that it matters much but I think the advertising clause is a waste
of time and does make life far more difficult for the people who do
want to comply with the licence conditions - they have to trawl
through all the code and pull out all the individuals that want their
names mentioned. It made a little more sense when the sources were
under the BSD umbrella but now it's just silly having to list a cast
of thousands in any advertising.
--
Brett Lymn
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
| Satyam Sharma | [PATCH 0/8] i386: bitops: Cleanup, sanitize, optimize |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
